Forum Discussion
Grogu_4470
5 years agoSeasoned Ace
"WookieWookie;c-2199968" wrote:"TheChild_eats_eggs1;c-2199966" wrote:
This is different. They didn't nerf his leader -- they miswrote it, so it means something totally different. It was a mistake on CG's part, not a nerf. So people should have their lead zeta refunded. btw I don't have the lead zeta.
So... exactly the same situation, when a poorly written description made an ability appear to function universally in contrast to only within the characters' own factions as it does in game/the coding?
No... One was a nerf to a unique ability. The other was the wording was wrong in-game. They are very different. A nerf is when an ability is changed. Wrong wording is when CG developers have written x but the in-game description shows y but in-game x still occurs. In this case, the x was there was no lead if there weren't 2 attackers, 1 tank, 1 support + Gideon; and y was if all allies are ITs but not the required type (attacker/support/tank), you still got the best part of the leader ability. FYI
About SWGOH General Discussion
Discuss and share your feedback on Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes with fellow players.81,276 PostsLatest Activity: 7 minutes ago
Community Highlights
- CG_Meathead3 months ago
Capital Games Team
- CG_Meathead2 years ago
Capital Games Team
Recent Discussions
- 7 minutes ago
- 2 hours ago
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago