Clones vs. Padmé
Thanks CG for making it so that clones can't even take down one toon vs. Padmé. Genius.🙄
Forum Discussion
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
"JDIII;c-2036590" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036521" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2036515" wrote:
How is this thread about a bad player blaming game design as the reason why his B-level squad couldnt touch a meta level squad (that is also a hard counter to said b squad) still going?
You indeed are "little". You're proving my point, albeit unwittingly. The clones CAN touch metas (that are harder to farm than Padme), but against her all we get is a running joke. There's no point in even beginning the match. But if that's the pinnacle of your game theory aspirations, I understand. When I was 6, I had similar ones.
I haven’t seen a single Clone team in top 100 against meta teams (DR/Malk, GAS, Padme, GG variant squads). Clones are a C squad, very low B
To fully respond to his claim you need to show what the top 20 of your shard looks like."jhbuchholz;c-2036877" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
"JDIII;c-2036590" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036521" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2036515" wrote:
How is this thread about a bad player blaming game design as the reason why his B-level squad couldnt touch a meta level squad (that is also a hard counter to said b squad) still going?
You indeed are "little". You're proving my point, albeit unwittingly. The clones CAN touch metas (that are harder to farm than Padme), but against her all we get is a running joke. There's no point in even beginning the match. But if that's the pinnacle of your game theory aspirations, I understand. When I was 6, I had similar ones.
I haven’t seen a single Clone team in top 100 against meta teams (DR/Malk, GAS, Padme, GG variant squads). Clones are a C squad, very low B
To fully respond to his claim you need to show what the top 20 of your shard looks like."MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:
In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.
After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.
In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.
It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.
TL/DR"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
They're an excellent tier 2 team
Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win."Treeburner;c-2036847" wrote:
It's doable . It's difficult and unless you know what your doing and have a decent rng it's okay.
I basically had to 4 Vs 1 with only rex and turret left and still won . After fives sacrifices rex having 300k+ h/p and 580+ speed it's not long before each nuke.
DM me it's possible to learn such power , but not from a Jedi
We’re you using Arc Trooper?"Baby_Yoda;c-2036880" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
"JDIII;c-2036590" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036521" wrote:
"littleMAC77;c-2036515" wrote:
How is this thread about a bad player blaming game design as the reason why his B-level squad couldnt touch a meta level squad (that is also a hard counter to said b squad) still going?
You indeed are "little". You're proving my point, albeit unwittingly. The clones CAN touch metas (that are harder to farm than Padme), but against her all we get is a running joke. There's no point in even beginning the match. But if that's the pinnacle of your game theory aspirations, I understand. When I was 6, I had similar ones.
I haven’t seen a single Clone team in top 100 against meta teams (DR/Malk, GAS, Padme, GG variant squads). Clones are a C squad, very low B
And I've taken #1 before. They're an excellent tier 2 team than can punch up on tier 1 teams like r7 JKR & with a lot of luck, Malak too.
Without Anakin the team is C+ B
You've been wrong like 6 times in row... You actually don't want to use Anakin vs. JKR. Clone Sarge or Zarriss will do job much better. CS with excellent tm & damage off his basic, and Zarriss to essentially ensure Rex is around to AA opposition. Now grab a chocolate milk!!"thecarterologist958;c-2036881" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:
In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.
After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.
In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.
It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.
TL/DR"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
They're an excellent tier 2 team
Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win.
You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible."jhbuchholz;c-2036887" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036886" wrote:
"thecarterologist958;c-2036881" wrote:
"MasterJediBrian;c-2036874" wrote:
In your rush to judgment, you've botched the timeline of events. My point was that Shaak & the clones (w/o ARC) are absolutely worthless vs Padme. Not just inferior, but a cruel joke you can set on auto and fall asleep to everytime, never worrying about even getting scratched.
After this point, a couple people said they won with ARC. Against a full r7 Padme team, I'd still like to see it to believe it. There's no hypocrisy in saying you can live with a squad being inferior, but that you feel their quality & tier warrant at least a minimal threat to 1 or 2 toons. Playing "who can lay down the fastest with no accomplishment whatsoever" may be your ideal game design, not mine.
In your rush to deny me any ground in this debate, you failed to realise I was providing examples of your obtuse nature, not a comprehensive chronology of this thread. Also I'm well aware that is your point, my counter is that there is no reason it shouldn't be when Padme is designed to oppose the features clones use to deal damage, it's a similar situation with geos, and with CLS against KRU, which I recall you agreeing was acceptable, that is where the hypocrisy lies.
It is also backwards thinking to say a team should beat something because they are good, when the fact they can't beat something is an argument against them being good, it's like saying "Ewoks are the best team in the game, so why do I keep losing with them?" Oh and just a side note, my ideal game design for this is one where you actually need to think before you play and invest, not just work on one team and expect it to demolish everything as you have.
TL/DR"MasterJediBrian;c-2036876" wrote:
They're an excellent tier 2 team
Padme is tier 1, you shouldn't expect to win.
You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible.
Then the point of this thread is that you'd like to... lose less decisively? ?
GET THE MAN A BEER!!! ??? YESSSS!!! ? And if I may sir (channeling my Oliver Twist), "Please sir, I'd like a less decisive loss that means I actually damaged you a tiny, tiny, eency weency, tiny bit, in hopes a 2nd or 3rd battle may prove fruitful!""MasterJediBrian;c-2036886" wrote:
You misrepresent people so well, you should be a lawyer. I never said I expected to win. And in the other matches, you say are similar, some casualties are possible.
Lawyers are sworn to tell the truth, that would imply I am doing just that, just as you have implied you would like them to win from your comparisons to how well they do against other meta teams. Yes, just as some casualties are possible against Padme by apparently everyone in this thread who has geared clones bar you. Also you do damage them a little, but if you aren't even planning to take her out, then insisting on using your best team makes even less sense, use a worse team that is better designed for it..."Treeburner;c-2036996" wrote:
Guys stop wasting your time .I have posted me wining with the team he said you can't with .
Now I will have to do it with Cody , sarge and Barris just t shut him up.
Arc is not the reason I win . It's the fact that I am smarter than the AI ,rex won a 4 Vs 1 with a turret holding him back by giving protection up due to the assists .I can clearly see ,by the way the goal post keep getting moved you are probably not smarter than the games dumb AI and this post will continue to grow untill you accomplish something yourself.
I see all the people I manhandled for like the last 40 msgs in this thread are giving you likes now. Glad to see they're off life support. Everything from rudeness, to misrepresentation, to dunderheadedness; I handled it all. Anybody got Sinatra cued up?
Now you're next. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO KEEPS CHANGING THE GOAL POSTS! If I was right about Shaak & the 501st with CS or Cody or Barriss, "shh, shh, reference ARC...no wait, use a Rex lead, no... and all 5 clones, um, and be sure not to show proof of facing an r7 Padme... and... "
If you're saying the turret gave you protection (I haven't used ARC yet), then it's fair to say ARC won that battle for you.Your daily regimen:? ?--> Shaak??----> Rex??-->Take out a 5th??-->Put in ARC??...
And so my original premise holds: Shaak, Rex, Echo, Fives & Clone Sarge won't do diddly vs. Padmé. But sure, if you can send a video that shows you selecting a full r7 Padme squad to fight & then winning with Barriss, Cody or CS, I'll look at it."Baby_Yoda;c-2037457" wrote:
@Kyno
Delete.
☝️Forums' #1 antagonist right here.
