"No_Try;c-1766239" wrote:
They mean the base speed in term of mods. 280s is good enough to go first before anything non-Revan. It's pretty bad Revan vs Revan but not a pure loss either.
"7AnimalMother;c-1766232" wrote:"chionophile;c-1765950" wrote:
The fastest Revans I've seen have been in the mid 320s, tend to stay in the top 20-30 on D, and I assume are taking top 5 (if not first) at payout.
I'd hate to be on a shard where I fell to 20-30 on D with a +160 mod set on key toon. :)
"chionophile;c-1766254" wrote:"No_Try;c-1766239" wrote:
They mean the base speed in term of mods. 280s is good enough to go first before anything non-Revan. It's pretty bad Revan vs Revan but not a pure loss either.
I routinely go before faster Revans using CLS. Granted, that doesn't really matter when you're on offense using Revan, since the AI isn't smart enough to pull it off anyway.
He was around 20th when i checked earlier. It's a competitive shard.
"No_Try;c-1766274" wrote:"chionophile;c-1766254" wrote:"No_Try;c-1766239" wrote:
They mean the base speed in term of mods. 280s is good enough to go first before anything non-Revan. It's pretty bad Revan vs Revan but not a pure loss either.
I routinely go before faster Revans using CLS. Granted, that doesn't really matter when you're on offense using Revan, since the AI isn't smart enough to pull it off anyway.
He was around 20th when i checked earlier. It's a competitive shard.
You mean due to Han? I think I will prefer to use my Rebels still for climbing. But I have to sit with a good Revan.
"Vendi1983;c-1766226" wrote:
It's not that we didn't believe you, just that the odds are not in one's favor to recreate it.
