Forum Discussion

Pengin83's avatar
5 years ago

Turn Meter Overflow and Bonus Turns

I’m not sure the interaction in the link below is working properly. I just played a match with Vader under a zEP lead against a padme team. Vader was the fastest character in the match by far. During Merciless Massacre, Vader dropped Ashoka below 50% health. JKA took his bonus turn next, then padme took a turn, and then Vader continued his massacre. If I’m reading the post correct, my Vader should have continued taking turns because all 3 characters received a bonus turn, but Vader was the fastest of all 3.

Speeds:
Vader = 270 before No Escape
JKA = 274
Padme = 283

Is No escape not factored into the tie breaker?

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/234241/turn-meter-speed-overflow-changes#latest
  • "Merailla;c-2193596" wrote:
    "scuba;c-2193565" wrote:
    "scuba;c-2193556" wrote:
    "Vendi1983;c-2193542" wrote:
    My guess is that the damage from FC is what caused GK to drop below 50%. If so, that means the debuffs haven't been applied yet, so JKA's bonus turn is triggered right there, meaning he has his BT before Vader's from MM + overflow from debuffs. It's an order of operations thing, like zOld Ben taunting through Fracture.


    I am thinking this is it also, because they are making bonus turns go first, JKA gets his bonus turn triggered before Vader, wouldn't be the first time something did work as planned.

    Also Merailla how do you know jka is at 30% tm when it happens? Guess or did you math it?


    I take it back. It looks like while vader has the merciless buff he is prevented from tm gains (speed_recovery)


    So no matter how many debuffs he lands he will have 0 overflow
    It even says so in his ability
    Merciless: +50% Offense, +25% Critical Chance, and +50% Critical Damage; immune to Fear, Stun, and Turn Meter manipulation and Darth Vader's bonus turns do not trigger other characters' effects based on bonus turns or Turn Meter gain


    Thx for being helpful unlike @Waqui



    It's obviously easier for you to resolve to personal attacks than to admit your own mistake in your description of the scenario. Well, done, @Merailla. *golf clap*
  • @Waqui If you would have posted the MM description, I would have said thx to you..But you did not, did you? You posted obvious stuff that has nothing to do with my question what so ever.
  • "Merailla;c-2193631" wrote:
    If you would have posted the MM description, I would have said thx to you..


    You made a mistake. I tried to help. I don't need your gratitude. Just skip the personal attacks.
  • "Waqui;c-2193633" wrote:
    "Merailla;c-2193631" wrote:
    If you would have posted the MM description, I would have said thx to you..


    You made a mistake. I tried to help. I don't need your gratitude. Just skip the personal attacks.


    I think i have solution to this. I will add you to my ignore list, pls do the same.