What is your GAC Weakness?

Not caring enough.

Being too lazy to check all of my opponent's mods on their defending squads. Costs me on occasion.

my weakness is that I am regularly paired against accounts with 1-3m more GP than I have (currently on 3.8m) in Chromium

Please note that doesn't mean that I am losing all time, my last rounds were like 1:2, 2:1, 2:1, 2:1.
It does mean though, that I can't properly analyze my lost matches, simply because the large disparity is overshadowing everything.
Most probably I do a lot of things right, otherwise I would not eek out a single win, but like I said it is difficult for me to really understand if and when I made poor decisions.

@DarjeloSalas voila: https://swgoh.gg/p/142831613/ so that you can check

Examples:
my own GP is 3.8m

in last round I had following opponents:
5.8m GP - loss, 3.0m GP - win, 6.8m GP - win

In the previous round I had following opponents
6.4m GP - loss, 5.6m GP - win, 5.8m GP - win

that is certainly within the range of 1m-3m more GP than I have on average

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374436" wrote:

I’m well aware that GP mismatches happen, and I’m equally aware that despite these large mismatches the lower GP player will still frequently get a win (though largely due to inactivity from their opponent).

Can you please provide some data to prove your claim that the lower GP players frequently win. That is a bold claim. I say it is the opposite. The lower GP players are at a disadvantage and most likely lose way more often in these mismatches. So please prove your words.
Moreover mismatches don't just happen, they are regular occurrences. Regular.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374441" wrote:

"Daclif;c-2374439" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374436" wrote:

I’m well aware that GP mismatches happen, and I’m equally aware that despite these large mismatches the lower GP player will still frequently get a win (though largely due to inactivity from their opponent).

Can you please provide some data to prove your claim that the lower GP players frequently win. That is a bold claim. I say it is the opposite. The lower GP players are at a disadvantage and most likely lose way more often in these mismatches. So please prove your words.
Moreover mismatches don't just happen, they are regular occurrences. Regular.

You won some of yours.

I’ll provide proof of lower GP frequently winning when you provide proof that these are regular occurrences

Easy, a short search just in this very forum provides with me a large number of hits if I look for posts about players reporting about their GP mismatches. Given that this forum represents only a small subset of all players we can assume that the real number of GP mismatches is hence much larger. This qualifies for regular occurrences.
Your turn.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374553" wrote:

"Daclif;c-2374494" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374441" wrote:

"Daclif;c-2374439" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374436" wrote:

I’m well aware that GP mismatches happen, and I’m equally aware that despite these large mismatches the lower GP player will still frequently get a win (though largely due to inactivity from their opponent).

Can you please provide some data to prove your claim that the lower GP players frequently win. That is a bold claim. I say it is the opposite. The lower GP players are at a disadvantage and most likely lose way more often in these mismatches. So please prove your words.
Moreover mismatches don't just happen, they are regular occurrences. Regular.

You won some of yours.

I’ll provide proof of lower GP frequently winning when you provide proof that these are regular occurrences

Easy, a short search just in this very forum provides with me a large number of hits if I look for posts about players reporting about their GP mismatches. Given that this forum represents only a small subset of all players we can assume that the real number of GP mismatches is hence much larger. This qualifies for regular occurrences.
Your turn.

Easy.

A short search on this forum sees many people saying that they keep getting matched with people with 1M+ more GP. If it keeps happening, they must win some of those matchups to keep being matched with much bigger rosters.

Bear in mind I said that the lower GP player frequently wins. I think you’ve picked that up as me saying they win more often than not - which is not what I’m saying.

Or they keep being matched up with players that don't belong where the smaller players are? You only see one side... one must be too good/win enough to be matched with bigger players. That's the theory, the reality looks quite different. Enough players in lower divisions/ leagues where they don't belong. Not to mention a win that promotes players just because the opponent didn't show.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374553" wrote:

"Daclif;c-2374494" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374441" wrote:

"Daclif;c-2374439" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374436" wrote:

I’m well aware that GP mismatches happen, and I’m equally aware that despite these large mismatches the lower GP player will still frequently get a win (though largely due to inactivity from their opponent).

Can you please provide some data to prove your claim that the lower GP players frequently win. That is a bold claim. I say it is the opposite. The lower GP players are at a disadvantage and most likely lose way more often in these mismatches. So please prove your words.
Moreover mismatches don't just happen, they are regular occurrences. Regular.

You won some of yours.

I’ll provide proof of lower GP frequently winning when you provide proof that these are regular occurrences

Easy, a short search just in this very forum provides with me a large number of hits if I look for posts about players reporting about their GP mismatches. Given that this forum represents only a small subset of all players we can assume that the real number of GP mismatches is hence much larger. This qualifies for regular occurrences.
Your turn.

Easy.

A short search on this forum sees many people saying that they keep getting matched with people with 1M+ more GP. If it keeps happening, they must win some of those matchups to keep being matched with much bigger rosters.

Bear in mind I said that the lower GP player frequently wins. I think you’ve picked that up as me saying they win more often than not - which is not what I’m saying.

In reality, what happens is these huge rosters fall to the bottom, where I'm at, and then they play. So no, I don't have to ever win to play against them because there's nowhere lower for me to go.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374553" wrote:

"Daclif;c-2374494" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374441" wrote:

"Daclif;c-2374439" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2374436" wrote:

I’m well aware that GP mismatches happen, and I’m equally aware that despite these large mismatches the lower GP player will still frequently get a win (though largely due to inactivity from their opponent).

Can you please provide some data to prove your claim that the lower GP players frequently win. That is a bold claim. I say it is the opposite. The lower GP players are at a disadvantage and most likely lose way more often in these mismatches. So please prove your words.
Moreover mismatches don't just happen, they are regular occurrences. Regular.

You won some of yours.

I’ll provide proof of lower GP frequently winning when you provide proof that these are regular occurrences

Easy, a short search just in this very forum provides with me a large number of hits if I look for posts about players reporting about their GP mismatches. Given that this forum represents only a small subset of all players we can assume that the real number of GP mismatches is hence much larger. This qualifies for regular occurrences.
Your turn.

Easy.

A short search on this forum sees many people saying that they keep getting matched with people with 1M+ more GP. If it keeps happening, they must win some of those matchups to keep being matched with much bigger rosters.

Bear in mind I said that the lower GP player frequently wins. I think you’ve picked that up as me saying they win more often than not - which is not what I’m saying.

The term frequently is exactly implying more often than not. If that is not what you wanted to say, then maybe change your statement to sometimes. Sometimes the lower GP player wins in a mismatched GAC pairing, but certainly not more often than not.

my weakness is having 2 GLs vs everyone elses 4-6 (soon 7) GLs

How is it a weakness to be in the same bracket as players who apparently have invested a lot more time & effort to build rosters but are just getting the same rewards as you?
My weakness is for mince pies & sherry but as far as GAC goes it’s probably over relying on Revan to counter Grievous teams & not having enough good alternatives