Why nerf Resistance?
Why did they nerf Resistance? Even though the description now match the exposures behavior of RP, RT And Finn, why did they nerfed them although they were not even meta or OP? Zarris user got a ...
Forum Discussion
"Neo2551;c-1060112" wrote:"JacenRoe;c-1060106" wrote:"Neo2551;c-1060098" wrote:"JacenRoe;c-1060092" wrote:"Neo2551;c-1060087" wrote:"JacenRoe;c-1060084" wrote:
Um... they have not changed. Only the description changed. It was listed under non-functional changes. They already weren't applying expose over expose. They just changed the text to make it clearer that it's doing what it's supposed to. Not a nerf. Just a typo.
Fact: Zarris got a Zeta refund for a single toon description.
Resistance got three description's modification and it was not clear from the beginning that the expose should not stacked.
Zarriss actually had her ability changed too. The way it worked in game was altered. The resistance abilities work the same. No change in game whatsoever. Only text description has changed.
Ok. I am going to talk to you differently.
They sold a product with a better description than what it really was. Under EU laws, it is called false advertising, and then they correct it. I think you are smart enough to understand what I incinuate.
Makes perfect sense. And I'm telling you that you started a thread asking why a character was nerfed when they are not being nerfed. The character has not been altered in any way. If you payed for them they will work identically to the the way they worked before. Absolutely nothing has changed about the function of the character. And that is what you were stating happened. Perhaps you wrote the ability descriptions. That would explain why they didn't make sense.
No, when you read first the description before change, you expect it behaves like the Jyn, Cassian and Darth sidious amd even JKA. There is no mention of expose over expose.
So if your saying they engaged in false advertising then you could make an argument for that. But that ISN'T A NERF. Two different things.
It's like you're saying you were murdered because your wallet is gone. That's robbery. Not murder. You're using the wrong terminology, and it's confusing. Also comparing it to Zarriss is totally wrong because her ability actually was altered. They are completely and totally unchanged. You're making it even more confusing to figure out what you mean.
