> Match guilds based on GP and not anything else
While I agree with you that the matching system urgently needs a rework (our guild usually is matched against guilds with 10+ million GP more than we have, more zetas, more G12 teams etc), GP only is not everything. We have already managed to beat a guild with 10 mio more GP. And putting a guild with 50 players of 1 Mio GP each against one with 25 Players with 2 Mio GP each would be very unfair.
I suppose the standard deviation in GP, the overall number of G11+ chars and zetas etc. could serve as better matching criteria.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like any of these have the weight they should have in the matching process.
Agreed @BeijiraReykvana - there's enough TWs now to use win/loss ratios to match up winners with each other and also losing guilds with each other. Total g12 toons and Zeta's should also be analyzed more over straight GP.
With the potential cluster of the new TW banner point system, weaker toons are more of a liability then ever - at a Certian GP level, say, IDK, 80 GP, or whatever, the minimum cap for toons GP to count should start going up. I.e. less then 80 gp is 6000 -- 80 gp to 90 gp is 7000 -- 90 gp to 100 is 8000, and so on.
As of now, most guilds trying to get ahead in TB are mostly dooming themselves in TW
