Forum Discussion

elelunicy's avatar
elelunicy
Seasoned Ace
7 years ago

Do you prefer longer or shorter announce-to-release cycles?

So back in TS3 we’ve had packs that were announced almost a whole year before release (Into The Future for example). Now we have StrangerVille that’s announced less than a week before release. Would you rather have packs to be announced as early as possible, or as late as possible?

68 Replies

  • I've got plenty to do at the moment but do like being surprised by Patches with extra content or objects that I don't have to pay for.

    I get a bit stressed when Expansion packs come out anyway as I feel that I've got to start all over again re-furnishing my houses so I'm willing to wait for those. Prior information of a lot of new building stuff would get me excited though.
  • While short release is entertaining and I think an awesome idea for GPs and SPs (although I feel Strangerville could have used another week), I think it would be wise to announce EPs further in advance.

    Why?

    I think they should take the feedback in speculation to "flesh out" the pack, such as a last minute sync to go well with another EP/GP/SP, add last minute objects and swatches, rabbit hole careers, etc. Little things simmers hope that is in the pack.

    Also, it takes a while for me to make an excuse for my sims to use some of the EPs, like Get Famous for example. My kid sims need to grow up a bit first and I can prep my story in the meantime. I'm finally fitting Get Famous gameplay naturally in my story (I know, I play slow lol).
  • Longer because for me is better to wait for something I've beeing speculating instead of waiting months with 0 news
  • I love getting the news and only having to wait until either next month or at least by the end of the month when before you had to wait a whole year and it sucked.
  • I would just like certain types of content to be confirmed, so that people can be happy knowing it's going to come at some point. Which I know will never happen because of how the privacy works, but that's my feeling as far as long-term goes.

    Apart from that, I don't particularly enjoy hearing about content and then waiting for it to come. I've never been the type to pre-order or get hyped (I think I've pre-ordered something for a game once in all the years I've played video games and I regretted it shortly after). For me it's best when it just shows up and then if there's a price tag on it, I can look at reviews and info and decide if I'm interested in it. I don't think I feel this way about every type of product though. I think a lot of it has to do with how often hype trains end in disappointment with video games. And I think it's only gotten worse over the years with all of the speculation culture and endless imagining of what could be. (Not that I have anything inherently against this practice or the people who do it - I just think it's part of the overall picture of hype trains tending to end in disappointment. The most important factor, in my assessment atm, is just studios not delivering something that is as high quality as their marketing... marketing has gotten more and more robust, while numerous studios increasingly struggle with a variety of issues in putting out high quality content on a regular basis, in part I think just because they always have and the models used in the past for making games were not meant to uphold a 'live service' mode of content delivery. The closest to it is online games and there are plenty that have struggled with the buildup of bugs over time and the difficulties of keeping people interested). The sims studio in particular seems to do pretty well at putting out high quality content and I would hope it does since it was doing the "continued DLC for years" thing before a lot of studios were, but it does noticeably struggle with its content being compared to past iterations of the series, as well as the strain of the base game technology they're working off of with all of its flaws and the increasing discontent in video game communities with monetization models that require you to pay on a regular basis, rather than getting a game in its entirety in one go.

    I guess this is a lot of words to say that shorter announce to release cycles are probably for the best right now, at least for a game like this, in terms of managing expectations. The downside of course is the silence in-between and, as I understand it, a significant portion of this community is not accustomed to sitting around and waiting with no knowledge of what's coming down the pipeline. Some people just drop off if there's no news for a while, which I'm sure isn't ideal for Maxis.

    If the laws were not as they are, I'd probably say the best would be to give as much detail as possible and use that relationship to temper expectations, to buffer against issues like things changing a lot in development. But unfortunately, that's not the world we live in right now.

    Then again, I'm no marketing expert. Just someone with some time on his hands, musing about how it all works.
  • I like to know pretty far in advance. Waiting for a pack gives me time to get excited, and the waiting feels less agonizing than the long dry periods. I feel more at ease knowing a pack is confirmed and I wish they'd tell us those things earlier.
  • When it comes to these sorts of things, I don't need much notice.

About The Sims 4 General Discussion

Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.33,820 PostsLatest Activity: 42 minutes ago