Forum Discussion
6 years ago
"Evil_One;c-17142452" wrote:"knuckleduster;c-17142385" wrote:"XxAirixX;c-17139837" wrote:
I'm not and here's why.
-They are not done yet, so much they can still add and improve on
-The game needs to feel complete and make sure all bugs are fixed.
If they can't do that, what would be the point of Sims 5 or expect it to be any better? It would just be starting over and expecting low quality.
We got a few more years, which I am glad as it means a better game and game that is actually playable.
We don't need a new Sims every five years until there is a major technologically breakthrough. I would be happy if they just updated Sims 2, don't need a Sims 5.
Yes, but exactly how much time and cost to the consumers will it be, when we already have full, playable, immersible versions of the Sims (1,2 & somewhat 3) now.
Seriously - we had a full game with Sims 1 & 2 going back over 15+ years ago with a fraction of the cost and waiting.
Because they were actually built with the players in mind - not like now where they are like how can we get more money for less content that is stretched out over years.
Why is it they could get it right so long ago and now, they just can't seem to get it together and we have to keep paying more in the hopes that "maybe this particular pack" will make it the best version ever?
Just sounds like more leading the consumer by the nose and training them to expect less.
And pay more for it!
yep!
:)
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.
33,185 PostsLatest Activity: 2 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 2 minutes ago
- 48 minutes ago
- 56 minutes ago