'....both sides of this debate are actually 'vocal minorities to the millions of people playing that don't come to the forums.'
- I agree, however my expectation of a user forum geared towards providing feedback on a game would be that more people wanting change would be active on here than those who are currently happy and therefore see no need to vent on that forum.
I've extended my counting from the previous post to all threads that mention TTK or Time to Kill - every post in all 27 threads with each user getting 1 vote counted each on their position and the results were 99 in favor of current TTK and 67 against.
'...what does that mean for the actual player population?'
- I've already said i can't answer that. But equally you cant answer what a reduction in TTK would be on that same playerbase without and assumption based on feeling, so i'm at a loss as to your point?
What i do think is, If out of 2.5million concurrent players only 67 of them can be bothered to vent their frustration on an 'issue' via a developer platform that the developer actively pushes disgruntled users towards to provide feedback it suggests to me that 'issue' isn't really an 'issue' to them.
'...In my experience they will try to retain those millions while still making the other side happy OR compromise.'
- Agreed, they'll have 1000's of metrics to run through alongside feedback forums and social media posting and will try not to alienate the 60% of people (based on my findings) that don't want to see a change in TTK.
Think we're in an agree to disagree. Having played the game and improved a lot over the last week there's nothing that's been said over 27 forum threads that has convinced me that overall TTK needs to change, or that a reduction in TTK would make the game better. Hope you keep playing, keep having fun and hopefully land a few more shots, to the point where you see that TTK isn't the issue it's being made out to be.