About Camping
Why do you consider camping a no-no? I understand that it involves slow paced playing, but it is a matter of taste, not everyone is addicted to STIM or wants wild west cowboy duels in an open field. How can you tell if someone camped the whole match in a place and not just arrived there like a few seconds before you. Why would you care, when you have Bloodhound's abilities?
Only things I find bad about camping is that it's boring to sit and wait and, when the fight comes to you, you're probably not warmed up like the other team. Otherwise, it can work great for ambushes, holding choke points, third partying, snipers.
When you own a well kitted sniper rifle, it may be best to down the enemy before he realises where you are and runs to cover or pushes you, especially when your second weapon may not be great for close combat. you need to camp for this to happen, to observe the enemy, determine where his mates are and wait for a good moment for landing headshots. On other occasions, baiting can get you the win, as you can encourage the enemy team to push, with the false confidence that they are going against a solo, only to get ambushed by your well positioned (camped) teammates and / or traps. For third partying, you also need to camp, watch you back and observe the fight without being spotted, planning for the right moment. You may not like third partying, but it is part of many real military tactics. Hell, even chess is about third partying the king 🙂
Note: I am not promoting camping against other ways to play, but trying to point out that it's viable and should not be hated so much. Like many others, i love how fast paced Apex is, but also like how it allows me to switch the pace and try a different approach.