@djentyman If there’s badges associated with it, it’d be swell. We had a thread like this months back. Most ppl were on-board but it all depends on the implementation.
The consensus for ppl agreeing was that it should be noticed clearly and easily. So if a player likes to take the reigns or is a good team supporter etc. should be easy to see, so most likely a badge (but then again, that says nothing much) or some kind of record by the name if you go to the squad option. The second can be a more robust option (if you disable it for premades before they start spamming the option after every game).
That said, the way you mention it likely negatively impact this game seeing as ‘bad ppl’ will play with bad and the ‘good ppl’ will only play with the good. People liked having it as a means of gauging a fellow player instead of a requirement to form a team... partly because SBMM now as it is already, is broken and with more parameters would likely be more so.
Reason why ppl also didn’t want it was because it could be easily abused. Lets say solo droppers... they would likely get negative ‘reviews’ because they do that. No harm no foul right? Well what if that solo dropper was going for challenges... what if he had a phase of dropping solo and grew out of it... worse, what if a family member played on his device and did it. He’d be slandered for it for how long? Forever... a week? A season?
Another reason is for example bad players. All premades have them. The apparent 90+% who ‘suck’. They will negatively rate them. But what if that bad person was good for the lvl he’s at or just had a bad day... this would also be negative for them. Especially if this system was to determine who comes on a team with whom. People would rate ppl they deem incompatible with negatively to reduce the odds to get on the same team as that person.
All this could easily be avoided if the system only had positive feedback, but then it’d be a scaling system, which would be better but could be wrongly interpreted. If someone had 10 points leadership, but 0 team player, ppl could read it as... ‘this person leads charge but doesn’t provide any assistance’ or something (I like to look at the negative side xD).
Only way this system would work and sorta have meaning is if it’s just ‘upvoting’ a player you found exceptional in a match and that it was for like a day or something. It’d be fun for the person seeing they got upvoted (anonymously preferably) but only be seen for a day.
What do ya think?
@djentyman 
