@SlivPTS wrote:
@Nino_Z
So you ARE comparing 60 euro game with free-2-play game.
I wasn't defending Apex. All i wrote is that "Overwatch is not F2P to comapre with Apex" and i still think that 20-60 $ from every player is HUGE differnce.
Maybe you can provide better example? F2P BR game?
I've been reading this conversation all morning... Y'all are entertaining. But @SlivPTS, I don't think you'll ever get it. His last reply summed it up perfectly.
If a $60 Triple A game gives you the ability to unlock everything in game (that's only $60 for all skins, all characters, etc.), then there's no reason a F2P game can't adopt a similar model. APEX becomes $60 after three skins, but there's a TON more to unlock after that. We're saying that games should have both methods - allow us to earn everything in game but buy them if we want to. As it sits, APEX gives you some stuff to buy but locks other stuff behind pay walls. It's very simple.
A correct assessment of the situation. That is my position as well. Let me pay a reasonable flat rate once, which will enable me to unlock everything within a reasonable timeframe.
