I think you misunderstood what I'm talking about, so in squad the game it lets only so many people within the squad or the team have snipers so you aren't all disadvantaged at range once you become combat close. So the idea is that once someone in the team has a sniper that there doesn't need to be three snipers in a team there can be one sniper or maybe even two but someone needs to be assault a front man.
My example of the fight I got into yesterday was that there was an impossible amount of odds against me whereas I couldn't even pull my gun out to get into view of three people with snipers because they were waiting for me to pop there was no chance there no matter how good a player I was I was dead the moment I peeked and I was. And they were all about a hundred yards off of me so in this example limiting everyone from having a sniper rifle during a combat as a team would help because after all this isn't sniper elite this is Apex various weapons and everyone having the same damn weapon for the final rounds is stupid when it completely disadvantages the opposing team.
However I was not talking about making Legends snipers only no one wants that but I'm sure they're going to put one in with a primary weapon is that as a super
I don't think anyone misunderstood.
@Ev3rM0r3 It works both ways. I usually carry a sentinel as a secondary, although it gives me greater range capabilities it also limits me at close range as I'll only have one viable CQC weapon.
Snipers can easily be countered by cover,various legend abilities and counter sniping...so they're not all powerful even if a full squads using them.
@Ev3rM0r3 To flip this around, if a full squad all decide to run snipers, and they then get hit at close range by squads using smgs repeatedly. Do they then have the right to complain that one person per team should carry an smg?
The simple answer is no.
Why? Because they made their own choices with their respective loadouts and it backfired on them.
Adapt and learn my dude.
@dSKyNafinchin wrote:
@Ev3rM0r3This change wouldn't make sense though. They would have to apply it to all weapons. What if you walk through a door into a room, and get blasted by 3 mastiff users sitting in there? Get team shotted by a good squad running 3 wingman? Ever play SWAT BR's on Halo 3? It more comes down to rotation and location. It sounds like that team from your scenario put themselves in excellent position to win that match, and came out on top. Personally, I have encountered a couple matches where I was in a bad spot against a team of snipers in the final ring. It wasn't the game's fault. They played the ring well, and it worked out in their favor. You can't just limit the amount of a weapon type that a squad can carry at the same time though, because where do you draw the line?
I do like the feature on Fortnite that allows you to view the entirety of your recent matches (not sure if it's still there, as I haven't played in several seasons), as it lets me go back and see what I could have done differently in any given match. Analyzing gameplay actually helps me a lot!!
I wish I got more randoms that understood this instead of trying to kill a squad outside a round 3 Ring under a minute til close.
Scenario:
My team just dropped in Frag. My team mate picks up a longbow and I don't have a gun yet. I find a sentinel. Game says "nope, you can't have that."
Can you not see how this idea just cannot possibly work?
