Wingman and the Peacekeeper
Edited by CM Alright I have never felt the need to delve into the EA forums, been through bf 3, 4, and hard line, never felt the urge to get a message across.
The Wingman, is broken. Accurate...
Forum Discussion
Oh, a pro can do that. That has to mean it's OP...
@Psyrecx wrote:
Oh, a pro can do that. That has to mean it's OP...
As for you, I'm kinda done replying to you. You never have anything useful to add, you miss read information consistently and confuse people, and argue any chance you get. Again, classic forum warrior. The fact you are [Comment Removed - Admin.] to see any points being made is your own downfall. Thanks again for all your incredibly useful input!
@Toxi_Kunn
So, because you throw out random statements, and have them easily refuted, that means there's no argument that can be made. Kind of convenient. Also, you were done long ago.you never refuted anything, you made a video on using the wingman differently than we stated, and ignored any point being made, instead giving your own which was irrelevant to the situation, and still is. thanks dude
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:you never refuted anything, you made a video on using the wingman differently than we stated, and ignored any point being made, instead giving your own which was irrelevant to the situation, and still is. thanks dude
It was not different than what you stated. You just didn't properly state what you meant. That's your fault. Also, you should probably learn what the word 'refute' means, because clearly you have no understanding of it.
@Psyrecx wrote:
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:you never refuted anything, you made a video on using the wingman differently than we stated, and ignored any point being made, instead giving your own which was irrelevant to the situation, and still is. thanks dude
It was not different than what you stated. You just didn't properly state what you meant. That's your fault. Also, you should probably learn what the word 'refute' means, because clearly you have no understanding of it.
Refute, to prove a theory as wrong or false. I used the word correctly, you simply failed to "dispute" anything correctly as you didn't ask for information. You came storming in here deciding everyone else was wrong (as you do on every thread) and started making baseless points, someone who actually plays the game would understand what we were talking about. You were the only one confused. Lol
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:
@Psyrecx wrote:
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:you never refuted anything, you made a video on using the wingman differently than we stated, and ignored any point being made, instead giving your own which was irrelevant to the situation, and still is. thanks dude
It was not different than what you stated. You just didn't properly state what you meant. That's your fault. Also, you should probably learn what the word 'refute' means, because clearly you have no understanding of it.
Refute, to prove a theory as wrong or false. I used the word correctly, you simply failed to "dispute" anything correctly as you didn't ask for information. You came storming in here deciding everyone else was wrong (as you do on every thread) and started making baseless points, someone who actually plays the game would understand what we were talking about. You were the only one confused. Lol
Yeah, because for something to be refuted, it purely requires that you agree with the result. That's absolutely in the definition. I didn't need to ask questions. You need to learn how to speak. You can pretend like you said it correctly, but you didn't. Hence the reason you had to go, "But, but, but ADS!!!111one", and then you posted a video of a pro playing and couldn't really defend that. It just shows how flimsy your point is. You don't like a weapon, and that's all it takes to mean it needs fixed.
I wasn't confused, I just showed what expresses the hit patter of the weapon the clearest. The hit pattern is the same when ADS'ing, it's just harder to differentiate. You'd understand that, but you ignore anything that doesn't support your opinion. It's called confirmation bias. You're only interested in anything that confirms your initial opinion, everything else is wrong.You just keep inventing "facts" don't you?
"The hit pattern is the same when ADS'ing, it's just harder to differentiate." *. Have you even been to the training range at all? Patters are completely different for ads and hipfire. Try the R99 for the most pronounced difference.
When you keep inventing "fact" after "fact" you come off as an 8-year old who just can't accept he's wrong and is too lazy to look for actual arguments. Not to mention, such fallacies thrown as facts are annoying and waste everyone's time.
He's all over the place. He's just here to argue, not make valid points. He doesn't seem to have the time played to realize what everyone else has, but that's just me making assumptions, much like he and many others on this thread have.
Nearly have my second account maxed, feels good. Oh, and I'm full timing the wingman right now as it's * amazing. Starting to hope they don't nerf it, they're everywhere and it's all I need.
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:He's all over the place.
No, that's your argument.
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:He's just here to argue, not make valid points.
Because everybody has to agree with you, otherwise they're just here to argue.
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:He doesn't seem to have the time played to realize what everyone else has, but that's just me making assumptions, much like he and many others on this thread have.
You have zero sense of irony. Claiming that someone else is making assumptions, right after claiming that I don't have enough time played to see it your way. Because, anyone who doesn't agree with you, must have not played long enough.
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:Nearly have my second account maxed, feels good. Oh, and I'm full timing the wingman right now as it's * amazing. Starting to hope they don't nerf it, they're everywhere and it's all I need.
Sure you do... By that logic, I have 3 maxed out and don't agree with anything you've said.
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:Just gonna start ignoring you, you're irrelevant to our conversations, all you bring is sarcasm and false theories. You were wrong, ばか. Grow up.
You forgot, video evidence.
Yeah, ignoring anything that doesn't support your fallacies will make them come true.
I've provided evidence, all you've provided was your opinion. One outweighs the other, and it's not coming from you...
@Psyrecx wrote:
@Toxi_Kunn wrote:Just gonna start ignoring you, you're irrelevant to our conversations, all you bring is sarcasm and false theories. You were wrong, ばか. Grow up.
You forgot, video evidence.
Yeah, ignoring anything that doesn't support your fallacies will make them come true.
I've provided evidence, all you've provided was your opinion. One outweighs the other, and it's not coming from you...Your video evidence was on hipfire, which very obviously has a spread, we were talking about ads. End of story. Any more to say on that? Think it was pretty clear.
My fallacies were proven correct, by multiple others
You provided one video of hipfire spamming 🤣 of which was disputed by everyone else in the thread, as that's not how wingman get used at anything other than point blank, in which case your point becomes moot.
Anything else you need?
