?.... why? What are you on about? If they throw out a dlc once in a couple of years its alright, why would i, you or anybody for that matter want annual paid DLCs? Did I miss something ?
There are rumors that EA wants to push BF to be an annual title, akin to CoD. Many people, including myself, dislike that model. The OP's post is a way around it that is continuing to add content (paid or otherwise) for year(s) to a solid base game. But of course, EA would probably rather pocket $70/person/year [although Ill tell you I won't be one of those people]
aaah so i did miss something haha. Well then it makes sense what theyre talking about. And EA... thats just something i connect to brainrot at this point. Ive got no expectations so i cant/ wont be disappointed anyway.
because otherwise they will make you a new battlefield every year and you will not receive the quality so the post wants to suggest that it would be better to continue working on Battlefield 6 than to make a new one while also doing additional DLCs or campaigns. and then give time to battlefield 7 use the bf6 perfect it and then take the best to carry on to the next one.
yes i was uninformed haha, Anobix explained the situation so yea, a annual BF game would be **bleep**e, same story like CoD.....
