BRING BACK 64 PLAYER BREAKTHROUGH

Play Rush then, they changed it because of a loud minority of crybabies. The original point of Breakthrough was for it to be a slugfest. DICE catering to you COD kiddies more and more.

I agree, bring back 64 player breakthrough! at least for most of the maps. the chaos is part of the fun.

Why are you lying? Mirak Valley is still 64 players, 32 vs 32, and firestorm too, LMAO.

these kind of people making posts straight up lying is insane, you didn't even play, saw people talking about being 48 and decided to jump on the hate too?

Smaller number on BT it's nice.

I think, we need 4 modes 

1. 40 total player conquest
2. 64 total player conquest
3. 40 total player breakt
4. 64 total player breakt

64 players are too many for small maps. Mid-sized maps like Mirak Valley and Firestorm aren't fun. Swapping them with Battlefield 1's maps would solve it.

sure, I also understand your point of view. I usually dont care about what the player count is as long as it's fun. But on Mirak Valley for example it just feels empty and all that people do is snipe you from miles away. Before the player count change it was an absolute all out chaos blast.

I think the real solution here would be, as it has been stated many times, an actual server browser!

 Then we can have 48 & 64 player count servers at the same time and people can pick and choose what kind of match they want to experience at any given time.

I personally don't like Breakthrough in Battlefield 6. I liked it much better in Battlefield 2042 and that's saying something. In my opinion the maps are too narrow to properly facilitate 64 players. It's too heavy on passive positional play and tanks and not enough on flanking and repositioning. So it makes some sense to me that you either increase the map size, or reduce the player count to match the size of the map.

This whole idea that we need to make Casual game modes because the regular game modes are too hectic and unpredictable seems like a waste of time to me.