M16A4 Attachment Costs Feel Too High

Question

Someone pointed it out and I checked to see that the M16A4 has the damage model of the DRS-IAR copied and pasted on it.
And it seems to be the case from looking at SORROW's BF6 Scribles.
Having it as a &nbsp;DRS-IAR clone on its own is not that bad, however it is completely unreasonable to charge 25 points for the A3 reciever to turn it into an M16A3. This means this gun has a 75 points left&nbsp; which is 25 less than the other ones.
It would only be reasonable to reduce the cost of the A3 reciever to 5 or even 0 and call it a day. The gun is not OP in any way.
Someone in this dev team has a real obsession with unhealthy obsession with overcharging for some attachments, especially magazines
(cm edit updated title for vis)

ruxem · Answer

The M16 is incredibly good, it doesn't need a buff in attachment costs.

up_hawxxeye · Answer

&nbsp;Ruxem wrote:The M16 is incredibly good, it doesn't need a buff in attachment costs.I have already explained that it is a clone of an existing gun but operating with 25 points less. It feels good because it is a clone of an existing incredibly good gun with the nostalgic M16 looks and soundsPlease read.&nbsp;&nbsp;

ruxem · Answer

I did read. I just don't agree with you on any level. You aren't forced to use the receiver, it's a trade of.

up_hawxxeye · Answer

Ruxem wrote:I did read. I just don't agree with you on any level. You aren't forced to use the receiver, it's a trade of.a trade off that just simulates an inferior version of another existing weapon is not a trade off but a Faustian bargain.

Forum Discussion

M16A4 Attachment Costs Feel Too High

4 Replies

Featured Places

Battlefield 6 General Discussion

Community Highlights

[GUIDE] EA Account Help: No Access, Disabled Accounts, Hacks, Bans, and More

Recent Discussions

M16A4 Attachment Costs Feel Too High

L115 sniper rifle needs a BUFF

Season 3 is here! We want your feedback!

I only get bot lobbies, can i disable that?

Ranked Play is DEAD