Manhattan Bridge
Is it an expectation to see someone go 94-2 as a kill death ratio?
Why is that possible - how is that possible?
The roofs were taken off from Manhattan Bridge, at to whose advantage?
The roofs in a city are a viable and legitimate response in urban warfare. Especially when there are "scout" helicopters equip with massive payloads.
Those on the roofs of Manhattan Bridge deterred those that consistently abuse the little bird. Strategically, there is the least chance to get a good shot from any vantage point as an engineer, there is zero chance to shoot it out of the sky as any other class - there isn't opportunity for t he AA for the same reason because of the height of the buildings are blocking LOS (Line of Sight). This is an advantage that NEEDS to be retrofitted to challenge "ratio farmers". There is no other map that does this.
Urban warfare assumes rooftop positioning. It's idiotic to limit rooftops and allow a heavily impactful and effective vehicle to freely fly around. It is JUST this map to that makes most sense to position or roofs to agitate/combat enemy aircraft. Again, a player can play well and earn a skill well earned, however an individual playing with a ratio over 30:1 or more is not a balanced game. Any other game would call for suspicion of hacking, cheating, or just BS to the point of disinterest; or worse.
This callout is just to bring back the roofs that were already available in Manhattan Bridge prior to an update - not every roof - at least some that were taken off. There needs to be more mitigation from the abuse of one vehicle on one certain map. There are enough buildings to block, a skilled player should be challenged.
Bring back the rooftops on this map, it was a bad call to remove them, there are no other maps or modes that someone can go 94 kills and 2 deaths. Consistently, at least a 20:1 ratio in a vehicle (little bird) only on Manhattan Bridge. Who complained to get those roofs removed? Probably pilots.
