Authentic online?

RadioShaqs wrote:

Everything that is broken and abused is on the offensive side. Anything that is useful on defense is nerfed into the ground. If games ended 0-0 yeah sure nerf defense but we are borderline into double digits now. 


It shouldn’t be like sure you can defend it sometimes sometimes not so it’s fine. It should be like rock paper scissors. The defender guessed wrong so offense succeeded. 


Not offense just did the same thing over and over again knowing defense will eventually not be able to stop it. Defense also knew and defended it right but you know sometimes it still doesn’t work. 

Alright, in the end, I don’t have a problem with it.

I don’t want defense to be overpowered, and I don’t want offense to be overpowered either. I just want everything to depend on the player’s own skill, whether in defending or attacking — so that when a goal is scored against you, you don’t blame it on the game being broken, but rather admit that it was your mistake and that the goal happened because of that.

Even if the score ends up being 10–0, as long as you know every goal you conceded was due to your own error — I have no issue with that.

Even attackers — I don’t mind if they mess up a skill move or if the defender reads it well and stops them. I won’t say defenders are too strong if it’s clear that the player has solid defensive skill. In that case, I won’t blame the game at all — on the contrary, I’ll blame myself and try to improve and be better than the defender next time.

If that’s how things work, then I have no problem at all — and I completely agree.

Because at the end of the day, none of us like glitches, and they’re not a fair way to play.