Forum Discussion

ILndStylez's avatar
ILndStylez
Seasoned Traveler
2 months ago
Solved

My 94 Rashford Evo has better stats than my 95 Rashford FOF

My Evo card has 95 pace 96 shooting and 97 dribbling with 99 composure and 93 physical while my Glory hunters Rashford is rate 95 but is only higher in passing and one more in pace at 96

Rashford FOF: rated 95

96 pace 93 shooting 95 passing 95 dribbling 88 physical

Rashford EVO: rated 94

95 pace 95 shooting 89 passing 97 dribbling 93 physical

This game is just so inconsistent and non logical.  The FOF card is rated overall higher when it is not rated in attributes as high as my EVO card.  My EVO card has 99 dribbling 97 ball control and 99 composure yet is only rated 94 when it is rated higher than most 97 overall rated players.

discussion
pc
playstation
xbox

5 Replies

  • ILndStylez's avatar
    ILndStylez
    Seasoned Traveler
    1 month ago

    The cards overalls should be based on the attributes and ability.  Thats my point.  Otherwise the overall is a random number having no meaning on actual ability. 

  • ILndStylez's avatar
    ILndStylez
    Seasoned Traveler
    2 months ago

    It is clearly written in the post.  EVO card and the point is someone with lower attributes should not be rated higher than the same player with higher attributes.  It is non logical  and not mathematical and observable evidence of inconsistency.  Thats why I posted it.  As clear evidence in the inconsistencies of this game and evidence the DEV team should look at and learn how to improve their design.  Basic math should be a pillar of game development.

Recent Discussions