3vs3 GAC really?
So CG moved the crystal income to GAC making it the most important area of the game, and now they’re forcing us to play a stupid mode they invented just to give players something different a lot of ti...
Forum Discussion
"InyakSolomon88;c-2356171" wrote:"harvestmouse;c-2356163" wrote:"TVF;c-2356135" wrote:"harvestmouse;c-2356133" wrote:"TVF;c-2356116" wrote:
It works fine because everyone is on the same playing field.
Are they though? Some players are going to be much better suited to 3v3. So the division/league you're in is based on your 5v5 capabilities. It doesn't seem very even.
Whose fault is that though?
Hmmmm CG's? Because they set up our new league system (which I love) then changed the game?
Let's say we have a football/soccer league (take England for example). There's a long line of divisions that go all the way down to grass roots.
You play 11 a side for several seasons, which creates divisions with teams that are competitive with each other.
Then the next season the FA (Football Association) say 'Ok, we're not playing 11 a side this season, we're going 5 a side!'
That would just be crazy. The divisions have been sculpted on 11 a side football and now the teams have to face each other at 5 a side.
Ok, our situation isn't as severe, but it's an analogy, no?
I'm not opposed to 3v3 being a thing, I just don't think it should be in GAC for the reason above.
3v3 has existed a long time in GAC thus rendering your analogy especially awful. But that's par for the course in the forums. Analogies are always awful.
I'm not sure what is with this small band of you guys trying mark your territory on the forums. It's like you don't read the posts at all, and have already decided what you wanted to say. Is it like a 'CG hears the loudest voice' type thing? And oh look, it's the same group of cronies liking your post. The same ones who do the exact same thing. If you want the forums to yourselves why not say it?
You like 3v3 and you want 3v3, I get it.
However,
I wrote: (And I'm paraphrasing) 'I don't think 3v3 is a good idea, due to the new divisional/match making system.
You wrote: 3v3 has existed a long time in GAC thus rendering your analogy especially awful.
3v3 hasn't existed under the new divisional situation, making your quip pointless. What was the point of quoting me apart from marking your territory?
