7.4m GP vs. 4m GP

gnerally means the 7.4m player is bad, has bad mods, doesn't participate, etc. while the 4 million usually has: goos strategy, amazing mods, plays, ect.

"TTudor;d-255390" wrote:
I mean, what the heck? How is that fair?

Its fair because out of all the players in the game, playing GAC, you two are similar in skill

"Ultra;c-2354130" wrote:

"TTudor;d-255390" wrote:
I mean, what the heck? How is that fair?

Its fair because out of all the players in the game, playing GAC, you two are similar in skill

*skill rating

It would be cool if there was some sort of recognition for besting an opponent that out GPs you significantly, but then again maybe not.

If the complaint about the current rating system is that it pairs you with opponents that have too high GP, then getting a higher skill rating for beating higher GP opponents would only exacerbate the problem.

Anyhow, I feel like GAC is a lot more interesting since the change. As in I lose more than I did before but it forces me to think about what I can do to get the edge on higher GP players. I’m a fan of the new system.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2354129" wrote:
These threads will never stop appearing, will they?

Some day the sun will explode. They'll probably stop appearing then.

"avihas;c-2354158" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2354130" wrote:

"TTudor;d-255390" wrote:
I mean, what the heck? How is that fair?

Its fair because out of all the players in the game, playing GAC, you two are similar in skill

You have very wierd definition of fair.

You each have the same Skill Rating, giving you a 50-50 chance at winning. That's the definition of fair.

"Kisakee;c-2354583" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2354454" wrote:
After "enough" seasons the ranks will settle and people will reach their 50/50 level/rank where they win about half their rounds

Why is everyone thinking that winning "only" 50% of my matches is what i'm going for? That's just what CG wants, i want way more than that!

And i'm certainly not the only one thinking this way. But when someone is doing way better than 50:50 someone else is doing way worse. That whole system will never work 100% the way CG wants it to, it's always a trade off.

You clearly don't understand how an Elo system works. You will win 5050 by design, not because we are striving for mediocrity.

You cannot change the 5050 win rate, what you can control is where you are on the ladder when you settle into your spot.

In other words you could "settle" for 5050 in aurodium, or strive for 5050 in kyber. That's how you determine success, and that's what your rewards are based on.

"Starslayer;c-2354678" wrote:

"harvestmouse;c-2354608" wrote:
I found their profile. Relics are GG, Vader, Han, Chewie, DR, Bastila and GK.......................not sure how any of that was bad advice.......

Relicing good characters instead of prerequisites for a GL is a debatable advice.

they were probably done before GLs considering his break from the game. likely from when g13 first hit

"ImaSmakya;c-2354682" wrote:

"Starslayer;c-2354678" wrote:

"harvestmouse;c-2354608" wrote:
I found their profile. Relics are GG, Vader, Han, Chewie, DR, Bastila and GK.......................not sure how any of that was bad advice.......

Relicing good characters instead of prerequisites for a GL is a debatable advice.

5 of those 7 are GL requirements.

If your goal is to unlock a GL, chasing 3 GLs at the same time is more than debatable.

Boost your gp, then.

I had one of these 7m vs 4m matches in the previous round, except that I was the 7m. Their roster was okay at the top, but had ZERO depth. So many characters that were level 1 or had a couple pieces of gear. Our top ends were pretty close to equal, but where I was getting another couple million gp was from all my g11 and g12 characters and their ships.

I'd have lost (still working on third GL, unlocked SEE earlier, but no ultimate and only 3 zetas; at this point he's only good for turning off Qui-Gon's omicron) except the minute he lost one battle he had nothing left.

Boost your gp. Even one more mediocre team is all you need.