Forum Discussion

n1579acdefg's avatar
2 years ago

Bastilla (L) + Jmls + wat tech

How is that working as intended? Wat tech should only regen a character protection, not basts protection up. I know this an old thing, but that really needs to be fixed or wats ability description should be updated to include bonus protection so it's at least clear. Just getting stuck timing out against that combo is stupid.
  • NotRealUltra's avatar
    NotRealUltra
    Seasoned Newcomer
    Its not bonus protection, its protection up

    The way it functions is that Protection up is part of the max protection a unit has (it increases it), and Wat recovers 30% of the protection

    So its all WAI, updating text to include multiple different scenarios seems unnecessary imo
  • But then shouldn't seeps link decrease it if it's considered part of max protection? I see as seep shouldn't bc it was a separate protection, but if it's considered the same for wat, it should for seep. So a simple update to wat to say max protection and protection up doesn't seem unnecessary. Or add to Bastilla "this counts at part of max protection for recovery effects" or something along those lines. No reason for ambiguity here
  • "Gurken;d-261549" wrote:
    How is that working as intended? Wat tech should only regen a character protection, not basts protection up. I know this an old thing, but that really needs to be fixed or wats ability description should be updated to include bonus protection so it's at least clear. Just getting stuck timing out against that combo is stupid.


    Are you sure the tank tech regens the protection up, i.e., the purple portion? Every time when I fight this team, eventually JML always loses all the purple, and only the regular protection would keep growing back by the tank tech.
  • "Gurken;c-2403838" wrote:
    No reason for ambiguity here


    SWGOH kits and ambiguous go hand in hand.

    Very little in this game is consistent or straightforward.