Forum Discussion

Ninjadad52's avatar
Ninjadad52
Rising Rookie
2 months ago

CG’s proposed change to Leviathan fleet because of Punishing One

I’d like to request, should CG decide to go forward with the proposed change to the TIE Dagger to address the Executor/Punishing One counter to the standard Leviathan lineup, that they refund relic materials to players who brought their Sith Assassins to R9 for those mirror matches. R9 materials are hard to come by, and they will be irrelevant on Sith Assassin after the change. 

  • R9 Assassin is already irrelevant if you use the Fury Sass, MkVI lineup on offense. There were also already other counters. You're the one who chose to put R9 materials there.

    • Whatelse73's avatar
      Whatelse73
      Seasoned Veteran

      You sound like you do public relations for CG.  "Once again we must remind everyone that the players are at fault for making decisions based on what we release and what we implement."

    • toadiac007's avatar
      toadiac007
      New Novice

      If it doesn't make a difference, then why is CG going to buff Tie Dorito to make it the better starting ship? Your logic is not sound. 

  • Range1974's avatar
    Range1974
    Rising Traveler

    A problem with CGs solution is that if the Dagger aka Dorito is on the staring line up, the Levi become# very easy to beat for better banners with a Levi on offense unless the changes neutralize the Fury, Sith Fighter and Mk6 staring line up on offense. 
    not a happy camper but will wait and see how it turns out.  CG have been spinning things out of control periodically for 7 years now.  We suffer through it because it’s the only SW mobile game out there.