Conquest 13 [MERGE]

Not the best at all. They removed Maul from rewards and added a ship…

"Rokaryn_Mazel;c-2335911" wrote:
That is what RNG does. Random means you might roll 6 several times in a row.

Do you really want CG to put in anti-randomness code?

It can still be random while requiring three unique disks - it's not difficult to do. But they seem to be perfectly content with it the way it is. As frustratingly easy as it is to fix, I've stopped looking for it to change. From a programming standpoint it feels sloppy and lazy but but at least it's not going to stop someone from progressing.

Good that someone enjoys it.

"Ultra;c-2335930" wrote:

"IronCross;c-2335928" wrote:
So those that waste conquest currency on ship shards will unlock the ship 5-10 days earlier to get a jump on a 5* ship. I’d care if it was a toon and I’d waste my currency too but not on this ship. I’ll wait until the end of the second conquest.

That's right

Having a toon locked 5-10 days on a paywall is not bad at all, also they were talking about 7 starring toons, and that statement still holds true (Boba Scion)

Still doesn't change the fact that the statement in the screenshot is factually incorrect. I don't think there's anything 'nefarious' about it either, just yet another example of CG incompetence...

I don't think the ship is OP enough to give anyone a major advantage in fleet arena or GAC. For me, the whole point of buying a conquest pass is that I get to spend my conquest energy on gear or signal data and still finish the new shiny in 3 conquests.

"Darthnoob83;c-2335989" wrote:

"Ultra;c-2335930" wrote:

"IronCross;c-2335928" wrote:
So those that waste conquest currency on ship shards will unlock the ship 5-10 days earlier to get a jump on a 5* ship. I’d care if it was a toon and I’d waste my currency too but not on this ship. I’ll wait until the end of the second conquest.

That's right

Having a toon locked 5-10 days on a paywall is not bad at all, also they were talking about 7 starring toons, and that statement still holds true (Boba Scion)

Still doesn't change the fact that the statement in the screenshot is factually incorrect. I don't think there's anything 'nefarious' about it either, just yet another example of CG incompetence...

ok

Im pretty sure they said they were going to resolve this issue last conquest. Obviously too much to ask

"John_Matrix1985;c-2335945" wrote:
Should be a way to get crystals instead of characters. Can't see this ship interrupting the executor meta and Boba scion was a major bust

You face him with his three omicrons and Fennec & BAM by his side in TW?

Unless your not in hard mode!!!! Then we will will charge you the same $30 but you only get half the rewards for the same real life money cost!!!!!

A new low CG!
If you going to charge the same for the pass regardless of mode, then the bonus rewards should be the same for both.
In normal mode the pass+ doesn’t even include extra ship shards only older boba

So how can a paid pass that upgrades your rewards, cost the same in all difficulty modes, but not the same rewards for same cost.

Buy the 9.99 or 29.99 conquest pass you get the extra rewards path.
In hard mode that $10 gets you new ship shards and boba + gear
In normal mode same $10 gets you No ship shards, half boba shard+ gear

How is that justified?