Conquest hard mode

Assuming that I can eventually beat the Sector 5 boss, I should be able to get the highest box, but I've had some stupidly bad luck so far - like toons dodging GL Rey's ultimate so I couldn't get 3 deaths in one turn, that sort of thing. So I have fewer finished feats than I thought I would have at this point ... but they all seem very doable, even if they're not actually done.

It's not "a change", it's the way it's supposed to be, but it is bugged.

I heard you about the way it's supposed to be. However when I said it was a change, that's absolutely accurate because it currently operates one way, and to make it operate the way you're talking about would be a change in the current operation.

It wouldn't be a change in **intent**

But it is a change in game operation/function.

I was speaking perfectly accurately. It's a change. The change might be, from CG's perspective, fixing a bug, but that's still a change from the status quo.

And as for me, I oppose that change. I'd rather see CG change their intention than change their code in this case. That's what I was saying.

Does anyone know? Are there only 3 purple data disks? Dread, booming voice, and the trash one?

Or are there more I haven’t found?

"MasterSeedy;c-2238729" wrote:
Assuming that I can eventually beat the Sector 5 boss, I should be able to get the highest box, but I've had some stupidly bad luck so far - like toons dodging GL Rey's ultimate so I couldn't get 3 deaths in one turn, that sort of thing. So I have fewer finished feats than I thought I would have at this point ... but they all seem very doable, even if they're not actually done.

It's not "a change", it's the way it's supposed to be, but it is bugged.

I heard you about the way it's supposed to be. However when I said it was a change, that's absolutely accurate because it currently operates one way, and to make it operate the way you're talking about would be a change in the current operation.

It wouldn't be a change in **intent**

But it is a change in game operation/function.

I was speaking perfectly accurately. It's a change. The change might be, from CG's perspective, fixing a bug, but that's still a change from the status quo.

And as for me, I oppose that change. I'd rather see CG change their intention than change their code in this case. That's what I was saying.

While this one case (and maybe a few others), not all feats in GCon are like this, this particular one and any other like this are bugged. Yes in the root sense of the word it is a change, but it's because it is not working correctly and in accordance with ever other use of this type of element in the game.

Opposing bug fixes that make things operate the same they do everywhere else and in this game mode is an interesting stance, but opposing bug fixes doesnt impact the fact that they will be changed and that change happening or not is not based on player feedback.

So as for reward scaling, I got 2nd highest crate (can’t go any further w the feats), here’s my profile, for those trying to guess how far they will get. https://swgoh.gg/p/546446366/
Vader padme and shaak carried me most of the way. Found Shaak Ti clones very good against: Geos, JKR, DR, and Grevous. If anyone needs good conquest counters ;)

"CT_Waxer_7777;c-2238734" wrote:
Or are there more I haven’t found?

I know of 4: Dread, Booming Voice, Massively Overpowered and Deadly Momentum.

opposing bug fixes doesnt impact the fact that they will be changed and that change happening or not is not based on player feedback.

It doesn't change whether they're currently scheduled to be changed, but this test of GB:Conquest came with an invitation for player feedback with the idea that they can and will change things - things not yet specified - based on whatever feedback they get.

Whether I got my idea (about the way things ought to be) from a bug or from my imagination, I am currently advocating that they allow people to play to lose (or at least not play to win) to achieve certain feats, including the ones under discussion (total crits > x over a full conquest; total thermal detonators > y over a full sector, etc).

Most changes players advocate never come to pass, but they did invite feedback, and this is part of mine. All I care about is continuing to improve the game experience for everyone. Maybe CG will disagree with me and won't revisit their decision on how to construct the feats, but the fact that changes are unlikely to happen based on my feedback doesn't mean I shouldn't supply feedback to CG when asked.

So here I am, articulating my position. The next thing that should happen is in CG's hands, not yours or mine.

"Konju;c-2238738" wrote:

"CT_Waxer_7777;c-2238734" wrote:
Or are there more I haven’t found?

I know of 4: Dread, Booming Voice, Massively Overpowered and Deadly Momentum.

What is massively overpowered? Haven’t seen that one.

Every ten turns (I think it's every 10 turns) you get an instant kill, if you want it (like an event special ability that does the same thing in GAC). If you don't use it, however, it doesn't pass back to the other side to allow them to use it (the way it does in GAC). It's all you & only you.

That’s massively overpowered ?