Diversity
I read one too many posts on how everyone is a drone and the poster is one of the rare original, uber cool unique players. How much they want everyone to be different etc etc. To all those guys, y...
Forum Discussion
"thecuriousocelot;267033" wrote:
@Azraelrulez I vaguely see what you mean. Having said that, the point of the forum is for...discussion purposes! A topic of interest/problem/bug for one person is boring/acceptable/not-a-bug for another. That will mean seeing OP's you disagree with and there will be discussions repeating the same thing, because not everyone will have seen every single post on the topic beforehand. In the end, it's completely up to you to decide whether you want to reengage in the same conversation you've had before or leave it to someone else to do so.
Speaking of meta, this very post will be lost in the vast sea of pointless comments seeking to placate the OP... :)
Nah, the rant is not because someone engaged with me. It's because I see a post where someone is sharing his joy at getting no 1 and another jumps in raining on his parade, how that achievement means nothing because he has a meta team. There's another kind where the OP wants some suggestions on a winning strategy, folks come with ideas and then this guy jumps in on how the suggestions are bad because they follow the meta, offering 0 ideas which are different and better.
This is not about discussions or disagreements. This is clarifying that the disagreement should be targeted at the game mechanics and not at the folks who have learnt how to use the mechanics to their advantage.
So if you have any ideas on what that fundamental change needs to be, please share.
There's no need to be a militant over it or ooze sarcasm on people who just want to share their wins and achievements. They can, of course, do it. Free country and all but it's unneeded, points to a needy of validation character (is that even a phrase?) and is directed at the wrong target.
