Ezra and kannan..They're both rebels and Jedi, right?
They're both rebels and Jedi, right? That means we get the first characters usable to get both EP and Yoda.
Forum Discussion
"ZephimyrAC;955068" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955055" wrote:
"DatBoi;953062" wrote:
"Fear_JarJar;953025" wrote:
Then why isn't assaj a sith?
Because sith aren't jedi. Jedi dont get all particular about the "rule of two". They just do whatever
It's really aggravating when people use the "rule of two" defense. Sith are not bound by rule of two, it's a guideline so they don't have another civil war. THAT'S IT.
If Ezra is Jedi, Asajj is Sith.
this argument does not make sense. Sith is an earned title, while Jedi is an awarded one. Ventress lost when she was left for dead.
Not only this, but Vetress has been on both sides, rescuing obi-wan from darth maul, training under jedi tutelage... etc.
Rule of Two is real because the Sith enforce it. Yes, they all have secret apprentices because they feel a need to show off their power, but none of those apprentices are ever reffered to as sith until they kill their master.
Rule of Two isn't even observed, it's just some dumb fanwank made from a minor line by Yoda, who was also wrong. Palpatine was under Plagueis during the events of the Phantom Menace. So why is Maul a Sith if there can only be two? Also don't forget Dooku. Oh, and any other random Sith hiding out in the galaxy.
Also, it's completely lame. Why are these evil dudes taking apprentices to train specifically to kill them? Just because they are selflessly devoted to the cause of evil? You'd think one would go "You know what... I'm good with just dodging Jedi, no need to have this extra jerk I gotta keep an eye on to make sure he doesn't stab me in the back as well"."ZephimyrAC;955250" wrote:
"Bossk_Hogg;955180" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955068" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955055" wrote:
"DatBoi;953062" wrote:
"Fear_JarJar;953025" wrote:
Then why isn't assaj a sith?
Because sith aren't jedi. Jedi dont get all particular about the "rule of two". They just do whatever
It's really aggravating when people use the "rule of two" defense. Sith are not bound by rule of two, it's a guideline so they don't have another civil war. THAT'S IT.
If Ezra is Jedi, Asajj is Sith.
this argument does not make sense. Sith is an earned title, while Jedi is an awarded one. Ventress lost when she was left for dead.
Not only this, but Vetress has been on both sides, rescuing obi-wan from darth maul, training under jedi tutelage... etc.
Rule of Two is real because the Sith enforce it. Yes, they all have secret apprentices because they feel a need to show off their power, but none of those apprentices are ever reffered to as sith until they kill their master.
Rule of Two isn't even observed, it's just some dumb fanwank made from a minor line by Yoda, who was also wrong. Palpatine was under Plagueis during the events of the Phantom Menace. So why is Maul a Sith if there can only be two? Also don't forget Dooku. Oh, and any other random Sith hiding out in the galaxy.
Also, it's completely lame. Why are these evil dudes taking apprentices to train specifically to kill them? Just because they are selflessly devoted to the cause of evil? You'd think one would go "You know what... I'm good with just dodging Jedi, no need to have this extra jerk I gotta keep an eye on to make sure he doesn't stab me in the back as well".
Plagueis is already dead by the events of phantom menace.
The Plagueis book really begs to differ. Written after the Darth Bane book also...
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Darth_Plagueis/Legends"Bossk_Hogg;955695" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955250" wrote:
"Bossk_Hogg;955180" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955068" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955055" wrote:
"DatBoi;953062" wrote:
"Fear_JarJar;953025" wrote:
Then why isn't assaj a sith?
Because sith aren't jedi. Jedi dont get all particular about the "rule of two". They just do whatever
It's really aggravating when people use the "rule of two" defense. Sith are not bound by rule of two, it's a guideline so they don't have another civil war. THAT'S IT.
If Ezra is Jedi, Asajj is Sith.
this argument does not make sense. Sith is an earned title, while Jedi is an awarded one. Ventress lost when she was left for dead.
Not only this, but Vetress has been on both sides, rescuing obi-wan from darth maul, training under jedi tutelage... etc.
Rule of Two is real because the Sith enforce it. Yes, they all have secret apprentices because they feel a need to show off their power, but none of those apprentices are ever reffered to as sith until they kill their master.
Rule of Two isn't even observed, it's just some dumb fanwank made from a minor line by Yoda, who was also wrong. Palpatine was under Plagueis during the events of the Phantom Menace. So why is Maul a Sith if there can only be two? Also don't forget Dooku. Oh, and any other random Sith hiding out in the galaxy.
Also, it's completely lame. Why are these evil dudes taking apprentices to train specifically to kill them? Just because they are selflessly devoted to the cause of evil? You'd think one would go "You know what... I'm good with just dodging Jedi, no need to have this extra jerk I gotta keep an eye on to make sure he doesn't stab me in the back as well".
Plagueis is already dead by the events of phantom menace.
The Plagueis book really begs to differ. Written after the Darth Bane book also...
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Darth_Plagueis/Legends
I dont think that book is canon- Why are there people who still argue about Asajj, Kanan and Ezra?
If you follow TCW and/or Rebels you should know by now that Kanan IS a Jedi Knight OFFICIALLY. He was knighted by a temple guard ghost a.k.a the ex grand inquisitor.
Since he is officially a Jedi Knight and Ezra is his apprentice, that officially makes Ezra a Jedi padawan.
Asajj was never a sith, yes she is a force user, yes she fights for Dooku, but she was never given the title of sith. And the Rule of Two isn't excuse. It's the sith's code. They obey it. Asajj is as much a sith lord as Griveous..
Now the next argument you'll have is probably "uhm hurr durr but why is Savage sith then?". Because he was an apprentice of Maul. Maul is officially a sith. That's why Sidious went after both of them, "There can only be two". Those were his words. - So is EP's passive going absolutely destroy them then?
"SikrouDeco;955739" wrote:
Looking at the roster, Kannan shows under Jedi, Ezra does not..at least not yet.
Maybe because hes not in the game yet.
The devs already confirmed he has the jedi tag in the phoenix ability post"ZephimyrAC;955235" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955223" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955068" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955055" wrote:
"DatBoi;953062" wrote:
"Fear_JarJar;953025" wrote:
Then why isn't assaj a sith?
Because sith aren't jedi. Jedi dont get all particular about the "rule of two". They just do whatever
It's really aggravating when people use the "rule of two" defense. Sith are not bound by rule of two, it's a guideline so they don't have another civil war. THAT'S IT.
If Ezra is Jedi, Asajj is Sith.
this argument does not make sense. Sith is an earned title, while Jedi is an awarded one. Ventress lost when she was left for dead.
Not only this, but Vetress has been on both sides, rescuing obi-wan from darth maul, training under jedi tutelage... etc.
Rule of Two is real because the Sith enforce it. Yes, they all have secret apprentices because they feel a need to show off their power, but none of those apprentices are ever reffered to as sith until they kill their master.
LOL it makes perfect sense, your're wrong.
no.. you are. asajj killed herself in a selfless act to save her true love. she ends up being revered by the jedi.
Vader killed himself in a selfless act to save his child, who revered him (and was a Jedi), so why is he Sith?"Setish;955849" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955235" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955223" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955068" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955055" wrote:
"DatBoi;953062" wrote:
"Fear_JarJar;953025" wrote:
Then why isn't assaj a sith?
Because sith aren't jedi. Jedi dont get all particular about the "rule of two". They just do whatever
It's really aggravating when people use the "rule of two" defense. Sith are not bound by rule of two, it's a guideline so they don't have another civil war. THAT'S IT.
If Ezra is Jedi, Asajj is Sith.
this argument does not make sense. Sith is an earned title, while Jedi is an awarded one. Ventress lost when she was left for dead.
Not only this, but Vetress has been on both sides, rescuing obi-wan from darth maul, training under jedi tutelage... etc.
Rule of Two is real because the Sith enforce it. Yes, they all have secret apprentices because they feel a need to show off their power, but none of those apprentices are ever reffered to as sith until they kill their master.
LOL it makes perfect sense, your're wrong.
no.. you are. asajj killed herself in a selfless act to save her true love. she ends up being revered by the jedi.
Vader killed himself in a selfless act to save his child, who revered him (and was a Jedi), so why is he Sith?
Um, maybe because by the time he did that (the very end of the movie) he wasn't a sith anymore since he was redeemed.
Where were you when Anakin's force ghost popped up alongside Yoda and old Ben....?"Mullato;955867" wrote:
"Setish;955849" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955235" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955223" wrote:
"ZephimyrAC;955068" wrote:
"Gank_Killer;955055" wrote:
"DatBoi;953062" wrote:
"Fear_JarJar;953025" wrote:
Then why isn't assaj a sith?
Because sith aren't jedi. Jedi dont get all particular about the "rule of two". They just do whatever
It's really aggravating when people use the "rule of two" defense. Sith are not bound by rule of two, it's a guideline so they don't have another civil war. THAT'S IT.
If Ezra is Jedi, Asajj is Sith.
this argument does not make sense. Sith is an earned title, while Jedi is an awarded one. Ventress lost when she was left for dead.
Not only this, but Vetress has been on both sides, rescuing obi-wan from darth maul, training under jedi tutelage... etc.
Rule of Two is real because the Sith enforce it. Yes, they all have secret apprentices because they feel a need to show off their power, but none of those apprentices are ever reffered to as sith until they kill their master.
LOL it makes perfect sense, your're wrong.
no.. you are. asajj killed herself in a selfless act to save her true love. she ends up being revered by the jedi.
Vader killed himself in a selfless act to save his child, who revered him (and was a Jedi), so why is he Sith?
Um, maybe because by the time he did that (the very end of the movie) he wasn't a sith anymore since he was redeemed.
Where were you when Anakin's force ghost popped up alongside Yoda and old Ben....?
I'm just trying to show the flaw in logic of the other person.- lol go figure some mothers basement dwelling neck beards gotta turn this thread into a debate smh the cancer.
