Feb Login - Sith Assasin

"Prior to the Blu-Rey the scene with Biggs and Luke at Tosche Station was never publicly shown in any format, yet everyone old enough to have seen Star Wars in 1977 swears it was shown. It was in the comic and novel and there is one picture in the original novel of Luke and Biggs standing on a roof looking skyward."

Fun fact, this is wrong. :)
I know because I owned the Lucasarts released "Behind the Magic" CD-ROM and that scene is on there.
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Star_Wars:_Behind_the_Magic

"Behind the Magic" and "Making Magic" had a few of these rare scenes before they where included in DVD or BD releases.

Well then take it up with LucusFilms. They make the claim on the Blu-Rey

Fun fact: George Lucas sucks as film director.

Fun fact: sith assassin is the character login.



(Slowly steering this boat back to sith assassin)

"AnnerDoon;c-1449835" wrote:
C'mon, at least get the name correct... Blu-ray.

http://lofrev.net/wp-content/photos/2014/10/Blu-ray-logo.jpg

Blu-Rey is an inside joke referring to Mary Sue. There is a great gif of her solid blu like a smurf.
Now back to insane theory of Revan coming because Capt Phasma was a login toon and Chewie Shards were given as gifts once.

"ChickenFett139;c-1448620" wrote:
Fun fact: It does not matter who the parent or purchasing company is. Licensing and intellectual property still belong to the original company.

Fun fact: look at the Star Trek licensing fiasco created by multiple purchases and branching. CBS owns Star Trek. Paramount owns the movies, not JJ stuff, and every TV show except Disvovery. Bad Robot, JJ stuff which is licensed to produced Star Trek can’t use any of the costumes, props, set design, etc because a different branch of the same company holds the rights. Disvovery produced by CBS TV can’t use anything that resembles TOS because the wrong side of the house holds the rights as well.

Just because a parent company has a name attached does not mean they own the rights. Disneyland Paris had to rent and pay royalties to Disney for use of the characters and name Disneyland when it first opened. It did not fall under the Disney Parks umbrella.

Fun fact: this is not how this works. This is not how any of this works.

"Lord_Terminus;c-1446370" wrote:

"RevanComingSoon;c-1446353" wrote:

"CleverWes;c-1446336" wrote:

"RevanComingSoon;c-1446268" wrote:
@CleverWes wanna have a wager on that?

I'm totally fine wagering that there's not going to be a full sith rework in February. I can see Palp getting some love. Maybe Vader, but that's it.

Alrighty!

!remindme 25 days

Jk, this isn't Reddit. But don't worry.... I'll remember ;)

T Minus 25 days. Let's see if we're right.

So...it’s been 6 days, 2 reworked and 1 new toon. How’s that wager?

"slickdealer;c-1451423" wrote:

"ChickenFett139;c-1448620" wrote:
Fun fact: It does not matter who the parent or purchasing company is. Licensing and intellectual property still belong to the original company.

Fun fact: look at the Star Trek licensing fiasco created by multiple purchases and branching. CBS owns Star Trek. Paramount owns the movies, not JJ stuff, and every TV show except Disvovery. Bad Robot, JJ stuff which is licensed to produced Star Trek can’t use any of the costumes, props, set design, etc because a different branch of the same company holds the rights. Disvovery produced by CBS TV can’t use anything that resembles TOS because the wrong side of the house holds the rights as well.

Just because a parent company has a name attached does not mean they own the rights. Disneyland Paris had to rent and pay royalties to Disney for use of the characters and name Disneyland when it first opened. It did not fall under the Disney Parks umbrella.

Fun fact: this is not how this works. This is not how any of this works.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thewrap.com/how-web-star-trek-rights-killed-jj-abrams-grand-ambitions-91766/amp/

You’re right. Paramount and CBS are crazy and don’t know squat, it’s only been in the news since JJ started working on Trek. The Disney stuff has been since Paris Disneyland opened in 1992.

"Lord_Terminus;c-1451888" wrote:

"Lord_Terminus;c-1446370" wrote:

"RevanComingSoon;c-1446353" wrote:

"CleverWes;c-1446336" wrote:

"RevanComingSoon;c-1446268" wrote:
@CleverWes wanna have a wager on that?

I'm totally fine wagering that there's not going to be a full sith rework in February. I can see Palp getting some love. Maybe Vader, but that's it.

Alrighty!

!remindme 25 days

Jk, this isn't Reddit. But don't worry.... I'll remember ;)

T Minus 25 days. Let's see if we're right.

So...it’s been 6 days, 2 reworked and 1 new toon. How’s that wager?

I stand by what I said. A new character doesn't make an entire sith rework. :p

"CleverWes;c-1445923" wrote:

"Lord_Terminus;c-1445798" wrote:
Because there’s a sith rework. We already have a thread on this. It’s in the what’s ahead as well.

At no point has anyone said there's a full sith rework. Palp may be getting something, but the full sith had a rework a year ago. They won't be getting one every year. That's just silly.

@Lord_Terminus So about that bet and the full sith rework...