GAC ranking is irrational
Are there any plans to fix GAC? When will winning carry the weight it should? Someone with one loss should never rank higher than someone with zero losses no matter how many banners. What this cr...
Forum Discussion
"GIJippo;c-2204650" wrote:"Waqui;c-2204639" wrote:
The rational thing would be to try clearing your opponent's defense as well.
And the gaslighting continues. Okay, so let's go all the way back to the beginning..... your opponent can make sure you don't full clear if he wants to. There isn't always a path to winning and full clear, depending on whom you draw as an opponent (which is something I don't control). This is precisely the issue. You are basically saying to go for the full clear instead of beating the tougher opponent because the win will be meaningless at the end of the day because people with easier schedules will rank higher even if they lose. I hope now you have seen the problem of how competitively backwards this is. But probably not, I've about lost hope.
You missed the key word:"try". I'm sure you will score more banners than if you don't try. You also missed the part about most times being able to clear your opponent even if he sets a strong defense and doesn't plan to attack.
Going for the full clear instead of beating the tougher opponent? No. That's not what I'm saying. Go for both. If you care so much about your championship rank then that would be the rational thing to do. And if it's a tougher opponent, why not just enjoy the free win (instead of the likely loss if they battled to win)?
How will people lose and rank higher than a winner? A win awards 1600 championship points - significantly more than the max possible number of offensive banners.
Be rational.
