"Rath_Tarr;c-2282876" wrote:
"MKHolloway;c-2282851" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2282841" wrote:
"SotaDraken;c-2282838" wrote:
"Rath_Tarr;c-2282806" wrote:
It's a resource management game. Part of that is monetization, part of it is longevity. You've been dealing with it since the day you started playing and you will continue to deal with it until the day you quit.
How can it be a resource management game if said resources keep losing their value/use as they are nerfed?
Narrator: "Because it is not."
It is a collection game.. Collect the new shiny toy every 3 months..
Either you manage your resources effectively or you come to the forums and whine about how you don't have enough resources.
That's not really fair to say. Most people in this thread at least have offered solutions or suggestions and when you look around the community there is consistency when it comes to them having a gear crunch. Sure is there people out there that come just to complain? Yes, but the same can be said for several of your posts (HT being OP, GAC auto deploy etc). Just because the issue doesn't affect you doesn't mean it's not an issue and throwing out infamitory comments that are not constructive in any way doesn't really offer anything other than confrontation and trolling.
The "issue" does affect me. The difference is that I acknowledge it as a fundamental part of the game's design and work within its constraints.
As I said, just because YOU don't mind getting bent over the gear train doesn't mean others don't have valid points. You can acknowledge and accept any reality you want, it doesn't make it everyone else's. Just thr same as your "issues" which you have created several posts complaining or asking for help. Have you now accepted those all as fundamental parts of the game my friend?