geonosians rework a waste of time
because I say this because CG said that it would not fix the Jawas because they like the interaction then what is the use of having the Genosians in defense of GAC if anyone with jawas threw them in a...
Forum Discussion
"Boros;c-1918470" wrote:"ColonelTravis;c-1918376" wrote:
Past
Present
Find another counter to malak, see how long it will take for CG to say oh this character is not working as intended lmao
While in not a huge fan of the way Malak was released and then changed or caused others to change I can understand the reason they treat Arena differently than GA or TW. The Arenas have a huge influence on the in game economy. If CG wants to "encourage" the meta (seems hard to deny) it doesn't seem to far fetched to think it's part of their methods for managing the economy. GA and TW have no such influence so it's not surprising to me they are more lenient with these types of unexpected interactions.
I think the Geonosians are still fine for GA. If I set them as a defensive team (and I do) at G12 (not there yet) I'd be overjoyed if my opponent used Jawas. It's not a guaranteed victory (high risk) and it's not a clean victory since most Jawas die (low reward). I'll never use Jawas against a well geared Geonosian defense in GA. I'll use a team that can counter them with fewer casualties.
