Forum Discussion
- At the end of the day, GA results rest largely on the top few teams. One Malak team can block off half a map. Can't beat that 1 team? You probably lose. Get that a few times and you probably won't make Kyber either. Sorry.
I'd love to see no map - just one section with all teams in it. If I can't beat a GOD team, but I can whoop the rest, I'll still at least get decent points.
But that won't let the whales win easy I guess.
So then let me use more of my roster - why only 6 slots (I'm under 3M GP)? That means another 40 toons are basically useless. Why?? Give me 8+ slots instead - we can both use more of our rosters, and see some lower GP teams (gear 8/9) slug it out for fun!
And stop the cross division matches. You have a 4 week GAC. In week 1, lots of one sided matches. The better players move up, and second week still a few one sided. By the 3rd week should be fairly even, and the final week should be close ones. That's how many tournaments work, with the favourites beating up on plebs early. Only in GAC, those plebs get to play on with easier matches each week if they lose - yay!
I really hope we get some feedback on how GAC went, and how many tried. "dominiQC;c-1940182" wrote:
How about lowering Kyber req for Div1&2? Not realistic compared to other divisions (im in div3 and it is much easier to attain)
No, d1 just doesn't have many good players that deserve kyber."Nothingface;c-1940188" wrote:
"dominiQC;c-1940182" wrote:
How about lowering Kyber req for Div1&2? Not realistic compared to other divisions (im in div3 and it is much easier to attain)
No, d1 just doesn't have many good players that deserve kyber.
More precisely, I would say that when I face a D1 player, the matches tend to be more defensive in nature, resulting in less banners on both sides.
And I also noticed while I was looking at leaderboards throughout the Championship that it seemed like Kyber league promotions were quicker and ultimately more numerous in the high-middle divisions... I want to say in Divisions 3 through 7, but I don’t have the raw data in front of me anymore, of course."Dk_rek;c-1940282" wrote:
"Nothingface;c-1940188" wrote:
"dominiQC;c-1940182" wrote:
How about lowering Kyber req for Div1&2? Not realistic compared to other divisions (im in div3 and it is much easier to attain)
No, d1 just doesn't have many good players that deserve kyber.
Div 3 and below should not be eligble to make kyber.... give em a reason to build their roster
Haw bah dat
+1 for dumbest post today ?"Dk_rek;c-1940282" wrote:
"Nothingface;c-1940188" wrote:
"dominiQC;c-1940182" wrote:
How about lowering Kyber req for Div1&2? Not realistic compared to other divisions (im in div3 and it is much easier to attain)
No, d1 just doesn't have many good players that deserve kyber.
Div 3 and below should not be eligble to make kyber.... give em a reason to build their roster
Haw bah dat
No."TVF;c-1941215" wrote:
"Dk_rek;c-1940282" wrote:
"Nothingface;c-1940188" wrote:
"dominiQC;c-1940182" wrote:
How about lowering Kyber req for Div1&2? Not realistic compared to other divisions (im in div3 and it is much easier to attain)
No, d1 just doesn't have many good players that deserve kyber.
Div 3 and below should not be eligble to make kyber.... give em a reason to build their roster
Haw bah dat
No.
lol was not a real suggestion just pointing out how nothingfaces comment about Div 1 having so many bad players was
contex- Can people still place just 1 team of defense or will they get no rewards of they try this tactic now after the change crumb just posted?
What if u dont set any defenses will it still auto deploy or will that player just get a non participation message?
How many points will the active attacking player get in both of these cases? (Do they get points for clearing combat and territories not set?)
@CG_SBCrumb - It looks to me like they fixed something that isn't a problem (no D set) and ignored the thing that is a big problem (less than max D set).
- Kyber is easy to obtain in division 6, just go hard offense, full clear every opponent and win at least 9 of the 12 rounds. The level of entry for Kyber probably should be a tad higher, but finishing in the top 200 is still an accomplishment to be proud of. I think most of the middle divisions are in the same boat.
"TVF;c-1941480" wrote:
It looks to me like they fixed something that isn't a problem (no D set) and ignored the thing that is a big problem (less than max D set).
EDIT CLIFF NOTES (just fill in the blank areas problem solved no complex formula to take points from people who are losing (even if 70 points)... just fill in blank areas... I don't get why they need complex here is a 0 formula that can turn to bugs instead of just filling the blank areas...... why is that harder than whatever your doing now that no one understands.
lol stop matching auto wins vs auto losses and that would never happen
I still think is hilarious punishing losers because the winners are not winning enough.. instead of figuring out a way to not have guys whos top teams are pathetic G12 pilots fighting 35 G13 gods
Better communication would help..... "hey buddy... I see there is no way for your to beat my best team I will stick him in the back so at least you can clear 3 areas i'll drop some junk in too so you can get some feats"
That helps too... instead of hahhahahhah this guys getting 0 points hahhahah gonna put there here blaww and a little of this here blawwww brum brum brum hahahah I love matchmaking hahahah crushing these losers HEY WAIT this guy cost me 150 points in feats whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa mommie"
Autosetting empty areas is the simplist fix..... EVERYONE WINS..... but instead.... guys upstairs.... "muahhahahahahahahh instead of just autoplacing it we will not do anything but set us a system that removes points from the people who are gonna lose anyway"
Instead of punishing the loser....just autofill the areas so no one can leave them blank....EVERYONE wins no more complaing..... but this "punish the loser thing" without even fixing anything is atrocious.
