https://swgoh.gg/g/TB_yHx15Q7uAjCeIsn7FDA/vshttps://swgoh.gg/g/00mf-DiuTuKDo7pE19QsPg/Seems like an even matchup, right?There are some things fun about this game, but stuff like this and the high severity of bugs hitting production is just really bad. I've worked in SQA for 17 years. I'd be embarrassed by this. It's not like CG doesn't have revenue to do better than this. What's the excuse?

Although looking at their guild, with names like "your mom" and "johnnyboobs" you might have a chance

This is just ridiculous. Because we lost the last TWs, the game now gives us a victim to end our streak. I appreciate that we get a win, since we have 302M GP singed up for the current TW, but the matchup seem really unfair to me. We need to deploy 28 teams per field, that means that our opponent has joined with less than 250M GP. I see that he is on a winning streak. But it seems really questionable that if you win in 240 M - 259,9 M and twice in 220 M - 239,9 M tier, that the game then matches 220 M - 239,9 M vs 300 M - 319,9 M.Well it is possible that they play very good (and even will beat us). But in that case it is unfair that they don't get the reward worthy of their opponent but based on their own registered GP.

"zatho;c-2357976" wrote:This is just ridiculous. Because we lost the last TWs, the game now gives us a victim to end our streak. I appreciate that we get a win, since we have 302M GP singed up for the current TW, but the matchup seem really unfair to me. We need to deploy 28 teams per field, that means that our opponent has joined with less than 250M GP. I see that he is on a winning streak. But it seems really questionable that if you win in 240 M - 259,9 M and twice in 220 M - 239,9 M tier, that the game then matches 220 M - 239,9 M vs 300 M - 319,9 M.Well it is possible that they play very good (and even will beat us). But in that case it is unfair that they don't get the reward worthy of their opponent but based on their own registered GP. As Expected. I am glad that we got a victory in 300-319,9M and thus our first droid brain. But this was no "well deserved" victory, but a granted victory. Matchmaking was really unfair for our poor opponent. And if he would have managed to win his rewards would have been not as good as ours despite the fact that it was the same match.

Our new matchup - https://swgoh.gg/g/VU4-WR7vTiqRs4yL4YMGCg/

They have 91 GLs to our 46. They put GLs in every spot in both front territories. It's pointless for us to even try.

Great TW matchup... | EA Forums

CCyrilS
3 years ago
Although looking at their guild, with names like "your mom" and "johnnyboobs" you might have a chance
zatho-legit
3 years ago
This is just ridiculous. Because we lost the last TWs, the game now gives us a victim to end our streak. I appreciate that we get a win, since we have 302M GP singed up for the current TW, but the matchup seem really unfair to me. We need to deploy 28 teams per field, that means that our opponent has joined with less than 250M GP.
I see that he is on a winning streak. But it seems really questionable that if you win in 240 M - 259,9 M and twice in 220 M - 239,9 M tier, that the game then matches 220 M - 239,9 M vs 300 M - 319,9 M.
Well it is possible that they play very good (and even will beat us). But in that case it is unfair that they don't get the reward worthy of their opponent but based on their own registered GP.
zatho-legit
3 years ago
"zatho;c-2357976" wrote:
This is just ridiculous. Because we lost the last TWs, the game now gives us a victim to end our streak. I appreciate that we get a win, since we have 302M GP singed up for the current TW, but the matchup seem really unfair to me. We need to deploy 28 teams per field, that means that our opponent has joined with less than 250M GP.
I see that he is on a winning streak. But it seems really questionable that if you win in 240 M - 259,9 M and twice in 220 M - 239,9 M tier, that the game then matches 220 M - 239,9 M vs 300 M - 319,9 M.
Well it is possible that they play very good (and even will beat us). But in that case it is unfair that they don't get the reward worthy of their opponent but based on their own registered GP.

As Expected. I am glad that we got a victory in 300-319,9M and thus our first droid brain. But this was no "well deserved" victory, but a granted victory. Matchmaking was really unfair for our poor opponent. And if he would have managed to win his rewards would have been not as good as ours despite the fact that it was the same match.
oxinferno
3 years ago
Our new matchup - https://swgoh.gg/g/VU4-WR7vTiqRs4yL4YMGCg/
oxinferno
3 years ago
They have 91 GLs to our 46. They put GLs in every spot in both front territories. It's pointless for us to even try.
oxinferno
3 years ago
It gets even better - https://swgoh.gg/g/LgDjURKiT2yE8DKJi7U4oA/
posh1311
3 years ago
I feel your pain but at the lower levels.

We keep matching up with guilds who run less players like 43 is a common number and they match up with us as the guild GP is in the same bracket but the average gp is way way above ours.

Shitting on the little guys where the matchmaking system doesn't work for us assuming I have the system correct as in its guild power + members joined sorted into a bracket
Pulsipher
Seasoned Traveler
3 years ago

We feel awful about this one…quite a few didn’t join due to the holiday weekend.

"oxinferno;c-2354602" wrote:
It gets even better - https://swgoh.gg/g/LgDjURKiT2yE8DKJi7U4oA/
Pulsipher
Seasoned Traveler
3 years ago
And the algorithm maybe is weighting too heavily that Good Against Remotes is coming off 2 consecutive losses?
St4rlace
3 years ago
I also had it this round that I felt absolutely sorry for our opponents.