How mod K2SO?

Dont worry about it. Google is already making unique mods for K2SO that only he can equip. Also you will be given all the neccessary credits to level them all up to 15. And you will get the credit heist too. IOS will get nothing.

"Odin_Noah;795619" wrote:
Dont worry about it. Google is already making unique mods for K2SO that only he can equip. Also you will be given all the neccessary credits to level them all up to 15. And you will get the credit heist too. IOS will get nothing.

A clear joke but it's not beyond the realm of possibility which is really annoying.

"TwoThumbedBobKelso;795621" wrote:

"Odin_Noah;795619" wrote:
Dont worry about it. Google is already making unique mods for K2SO that only he can equip. Also you will be given all the neccessary credits to level them all up to 15. And you will get the credit heist too. IOS will get nothing.

Saltiness level over 9000

*looks at watch* 9000 is about the power level of everyones K2SO now at fives stars. IOS scouter's are exploding in our faces.(because apple made them)

Doesn't matter for half the player base. #salty

:(

"Odin_Noah;795619" wrote:
Dont worry about it. Google is already making unique mods for K2SO that only he can equip. Also you will be given all the neccessary credits to level them all up to 15. And you will get the credit heist too. IOS will get nothing.

Lmao you guys are so salty. Blame apple for being such tight wads and not caring about anything. Google paid for the promotion, not EA

"Darax_ren;795754" wrote:
So if Google paid EA to delete random IOS accounts should they do it?

That is such a puerile argument I had to use an equally puerile counter.

That is no way the same argument. When Google approached EA and said, "Thanks for the high sales, we'd like to do a promotion for android users." You think EA would just say nahhh?

With the actual question, ID say depends on how you're gonna run him.

HP and Protection is nice, his Zeta regens 1% protection when hit, not a ton, but if you get that next year, spam protection mods.

HP and Crit Dmg if he's gonna be under Wedge for the survival and dmg boost.

Potency to land his debuffs and Tenacity to keep his counter chance up.

There are multiple ways.

Right now, I'm focusing in Wedge shards, so he gets the leftover mods I have.

"Darax_ren;795760" wrote:
It is the same argument. You're saying responsibility for the action rests with whoever provides the cash: but that's clearly not true. It's EA's game, they have to implement whatever they're paid to do, and they can jolly well engage their judgement before doing so about whether it's the right thing to do.

Let me put it in simple terms for you.

EA makes Google lots of money, Google offers EA promotion for making them lots of money.

EA makes Apple lots of money, Apple says, " Good, make us more money".


As for this; "You're saying responsibility for the action rests with whoever provides the cash"

That is 100% true. That is how any smart business works. The man with the most money wins. End of story.

"Darax_ren;795793" wrote:

"NicolasRage;795765" wrote:

As for this; "You're saying responsibility for the action rests with whoever provides the cash"

That is 100% true. That is how any smart business works. The man with the most money wins. End of story.

I'm amazed by how often I see this reductive, Darwinian view of how business works spouted on the internet, proudly, as if it's some kind of natural law. It isn't.

Businesses make choices, and are accountable for those choices to their customers and their investors. That's the only natural law here. There's no reason why anyone should need to check their brain at the door just because they are being paid to do so.

In the case of this decision, there are many enlightened reasons why a good business would turn down the Google money, or require that it be spent on a different form of promotion. The principle reason being that alienating half your customer base is a poor way to grow or maintain said customer base. This alone is a perfectly good enough reason for an investor or a customer to take issue with the choice made by EA. After all, it is not Google's responsibility to ensure that this game has a growing customer base, it is EA's.

In no other field of business would you say a promotion is nothing to do with the company doing the promoting. Which is why in almost every other field of business, companies are very careful not to accept promotions that are "off brand" or otherwise damaging to their customer base. You see, they don't get to blame the people who paid them to do the promotion when things go wrong.

Maybe EA sees more value in Android users than iOS? That's not my beliefs but maybe something to think about.