Between conquest, the proving grounds changes, the last GC and the current one is it even worth playing the game anymore?Instead of introducing new content, just make the current stuff infinitely harder? This is utterly ridiculous. In the GC my r7 decent mods Darth Vader just got instakilled by BAM with his basic....

I don’t mind a tricky Galactic Challenge- we have 3 days to tinker. I have to be okay with not getting max crate sometimes if I don’t have the right characters but T8 rewards always seem attainable.This is the grindiest Conquest yet - but usually it’s my favourite game mode - I get pretty excited for each new iteration.

No. It's not broken. I played it today.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2445102" wrote:They fixed conquest - though took longer than they should have to fix Normal. The last 2 Challenges were fine for earning 2 omicrons if you used the correct squads and strategies. I struggle to understand why Darth Vader failing is either jaw dropping or “utterly ridiculous”. I lost nearly 4 days of conquest here in Europe, and cg as a whole does not care. Didn't get the same crate I normally do.Because BAM did over 126,000 damage on a basic, his first turn with no kind of ramping.It's the same problem I have with conquest generally, how does wicket gain over 400 speed? Because he can outrun my Rey. These aren't changes that are doable with mods or relic levels. The fastest wicket in the game would still need over 100 more speed with chirpa's omicron. Except omis only apply in the select game modes right?It's not about strategy anymore when it becomes, well I guess I'll see if this works against whatever monstrous, unachievable stats they gave this team.The last challenge, I got 2 omis from, at least made sense, there was a gl. But what about newer players? Same for the cat problem? Contrary to many of the cg fanboys on here, there are in fact problems that don't effect me that are still serious problems.This year, cg has not managed to do any major change or introduction without messing it up horribly. And recently, even the stuff we've had for awhile they messed up.

Meh, it's something you have to accept if you want to play this game. Things get unintentionally broke all the time due to lack of testing. Been this way for at least a couple years now. Proving Ground this time around was due to the super comm buff and it's new version being used in them. Conquest was just a straight lack of testing. Really sad as it was just the first sector and they couldn't be bothered to do one run through. Regardless it's the state of the current game. I can live with it but would like them to do better.

"Jacgul;c-2445121" wrote:"DarjeloSalas;c-2445102" wrote:They fixed conquest - though took longer than they should have to fix Normal. The last 2 Challenges were fine for earning 2 omicrons if you used the correct squads and strategies. I struggle to understand why Darth Vader failing is either jaw dropping or “utterly ridiculous”. I lost nearly 4 days of conquest here in Europe, and cg as a whole does not care. Didn't get the same crate I normally do.4 days? At most it should have been a few battles. Once I realized something was wrong, I just farmed lower sector feats until it was fixed.

Is the game broken finally? | EA Forums

uncle_q86
2 years ago
This GC isn't particularly difficult. I got the gold box without problems. Last conquest I got the red box with 3 days left on the clock. OP, play smarter, whine less.
martinarvi776
2 years ago
"Ghost666;c-2445340" wrote:
Guys...very simple concept if you are F2P. If you no longer like the game...just dont play it.

So the spenders should keep playing even if they don't like it?
perfidius44
Rising Newcomer
2 years ago
"Profit;c-2445359" wrote:
"Ghost666;c-2445340" wrote:
Guys...very simple concept if you are F2P. If you no longer like the game...just dont play it.

So the spenders should keep playing even if they don't like it?

No. However, you could understand that it's harder to avoid the Sunk cost fallacy if you invested money on top of time.

https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/the-sunk-cost-fallacy
martinarvi776
2 years ago
"Captain_Drogan;c-2445361" wrote:
"Profit;c-2445359" wrote:
"Ghost666;c-2445340" wrote:
Guys...very simple concept if you are F2P. If you no longer like the game...just dont play it.

So the spenders should keep playing even if they don't like it?

I would assume that, if you are spending on a game, you enjoy said game....

You assume anyone who ever spent on the game will find it enjoyable forever? Or are you assuming everyone is f2p all the time except for the very instant they make a transaction?
martinarvi776
2 years ago
"Captain_Drogan;c-2445379" wrote:
"Profit;c-2445375" wrote:
"Captain_Drogan;c-2445373" wrote:
"Profit;c-2445369" wrote:
"Captain_Drogan;c-2445361" wrote:
"Profit;c-2445359" wrote:
"Ghost666;c-2445340" wrote:
Guys...very simple concept if you are F2P. If you no longer like the game...just dont play it.

So the spenders should keep playing even if they don't like it?

I would assume that, if you are spending on a game, you enjoy said game....

You assume anyone who ever spent on the game will find it enjoyable forever? Or are you assuming everyone is f2p all the time except for the very instant they make a transaction?

"Spender" is present tense. It means "currently spending".

and playing because of it,
So spender is not the alternative term to f2p? Enlighten me, what is the term to use then?

FTP or F2P = Never spent money on the game, once you spend you can no longer be F2P

Spender = Currently spend on the game

If someone stops spending on the game then they "used to be a spender" but currently are not. In the context of the conversation, if someone is a spender (currently spends), then I would assume they enjoy the game. If someone used to be a spender but stopped enjoying the game and stopped spending because of lack of enjoyment, that doesn't make them now F2P....

You didn't really read the original post, did you?
scuba75
Seasoned Rookie
2 years ago
"Whatelse73;c-2445491" wrote:
It only breaks when they add something new. I have hope though, that some day they'll release a new character, event, update, etc., and it won't break the game somehow. Some day...

Today's went ok (so far). Wasn't broke, they just didn't think about timing of the event.
avsfsapo
2 years ago
"Profit;c-2445359" wrote:
"Ghost666;c-2445340" wrote:
Guys...very simple concept if you are F2P. If you no longer like the game...just dont play it.

So the spenders should keep playing even if they don't like it?

As someone explained above...people who spend money on something (not only games) then become more attached to that "thing" and find it harder to dispose of it...in the case of swgoh i assume players that spent money will keep playing even if they no longer like it due to the "i spent money so i must use it".
My point was more to the contrary...if you spend nothing, then there is no reason to play something you dont like...
I dont think paying customers deserve anything less than free players...in fact, they deserve more as they pay the costs that allow game to be free for others. I was a paying customer on other games (but not swgoh)...so what i say above applies to me...

Forum Discussion

Is the game broken finally?

About SWGOH General Discussion

Related Posts

Game shipped broken, I can't even use my game as a paperweight!

Vampires Are Broken, Please Fix!

Which EP will be the final for Sims 4?

My game keeps crashing since the patch

Game Release Trailers

Recent Discussions

All New Notifications.... But None for Leviathan

Poll on New Updates

This community is so dramatic

Mini-whale backing off from SWGOH

Character idea: Redeemed Vader aka Infinities Darth Vader