Forum Discussion

Fossi84's avatar
3 years ago

lost 49 points in GAC while "joining"

Hey guys,

I need some input here. I am at the edge of kyber 2 (right now) and kyber 3... so each point means a lot right now.

Here a screenshot from my swgoh.gg account:



As you can see: After the last GAC i had 3370 points, all fine.
Then on april 5th the "join gac" day started. I did - and on this day, I lost 49 points. For what?

I already had set def but even if i did not - this day I only was able to klick once for "join", thats it.
How could I lose 49 points? Or is this a bug?

Thanks for any ideas.
  • "TrimleyGreen;c-2352029" wrote:
    "CCyrilS;c-2351994" wrote:
    He got squished into k3, and getting k3 rewards. Wth is he complaining about?!


    Ern Nope. I was promoted into K3 in the last GAC event.

    I was squished back so far into K4 2 days ago - that even after winning my first battle in this GAC I am still relegated back into K4.

    Also - show me where I was complaining. That post you are taking a partial quote from - is me asking why I had been relegated after a single battle. Which was answered: I had missed the update informing that the rues had been changed.

    If I did want to complain - it would be that the intra GAC 'squishing' was a tad excessive. The only way I can compensate for the squish is to win this GAC event 3-0. Which means that 7 of the 8 of us in this GAC table will end this week relegated - even the 3 people that win 2-1. Does that sound fair to people who had just been promoted?



    You can't be squished from k3 to k4. All squishes push people toward k3.

    Either you're the first person to ever be squished backward, or you're just missing something somewhere.

    Also there is absolutely no "intra gac squishing." There are more changes during the week now, but it's essentially just a number. Your rewards end up the same as they ever were. (You did say you're receiving k3 rewards, no?)

    I understand you weren't necessarily complaining, and don't blame you for seeking answers. That particular comment should probably have been directed at someone else.