"Darth_DeVito;c-2015437" wrote:
It really is a joke. If this is endgame content, we need to be able to choose mid-game content in form of DS Geo TB instead. They can't possibly expect us to go back to Hoth. How are we supposed to work towards LS Geo-readiness if we can't earn GET2 to unlock the Negotiator?
The argument "this content has to last" argument doesn't fly since it would be easy to adjust the difficulty and platoon requirements over time. In fact, I see no reason why this shouldn't automatically scale with guild GP. The same goes for raids. Maybe we wouldn't be so desperate for a new raid if HPit and HAAT were designed to scale up based on our guild GP. The difficulty could even be tailored to individual player GP.
PS: Remember, don't engage when you see the usual apologetics. Don't let pathological contrarians, agents provocateurs, or players with a bad case of Stockholm syndrome derail this feedback thread and turn it into a heated back-and-forth to give the false impression of a player base that is split on this issue. Simply mute/ignore and post your honest feedback.
There are 7 Special Missions (8 including Ki-Adi Mundi) and I didn't include any special missions for fleets
There is a lot of sources for collecting GET2 even without accounting for end of TB prize reward which remains to be seen. This certainly helps players to be Geo-Ready for Negotiator if they work towards General Kenobi, Padme and the rest of toons needed for LS TB
We still don't know if we are getting Signal Data / Relic Scraps as rewards either making this TB worth attempting, they certainly wouldn't want players reverting back to Hoth, and I'm sure the reward pool will supplement that stance