Matchmaking

"Kyno;c-2299395" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2299390" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2299387" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2299386" wrote:

"Joebo720;c-2299383" wrote:
They have roughly 60 more GL's? You don't get to 339M with bad rosters. It's not even close. We had 48 sign up.

Ignore Kyno on these things. He is duty bound to defend CG's practices.

Everyone else knows TW MM is bad. Luckily for everyone, the rewards difference isn't much, so a loss doesn't matter in that regard. Just have some fun with it and go stress free.

What am I defending, are you saying the actual match up is 290M against 339M? I can assure you its not.

Nor did I say this was good or the way it should be.

The simple act of coming in and trying to explain away the GP difference is defending CG. It's always been active GP, and at 290M I'd bet the OP knows how to tell how many of the 339M GP actually joined.

I didnt try to explain away anything.

Sure.

How about the total GP of the people who joined, the mods they have and the amount of GL on both sides? Total guild GP isn't telling everything; it could still be a fair matchup

"JoryG87;c-2299380" wrote:
How about the total GP of the people who joined, the mods they have and the amount of GL on both sides? Total guild GP isn't telling everything; it could still be a fair matchup

This is correct, the numbers you are posting are misleading as that is not what the tool is actually using.

It is only based on the joined GP. Also I know things around this are in discussion, so we may see some changes as time moves on.

They have roughly 60 more GL's? You don't get to 339M with bad rosters. It's not even close. We had 48 sign up.

"Joebo720;c-2299383" wrote:
They have roughly 60 more GL's? You don't get to 339M with bad rosters. It's not even close. We had 48 sign up.

Ignore Kyno on these things. He is duty bound to defend CG's practices.

Everyone else knows TW MM is bad. Luckily for everyone, the rewards difference isn't much, so a loss doesn't matter in that regard. Just have some fun with it and go stress free.

"StarSon;c-2299386" wrote:

"Joebo720;c-2299383" wrote:
They have roughly 60 more GL's? You don't get to 339M with bad rosters. It's not even close. We had 48 sign up.

Ignore Kyno on these things. He is duty bound to defend CG's practices.

Everyone else knows TW MM is bad. Luckily for everyone, the rewards difference isn't much, so a loss doesn't matter in that regard. Just have some fun with it and go stress free.

What am I defending, are you saying the actual match up is 290M against 339M? I can assure you its not.

Nor did I say this was good or the way it should be.

"Kyno;c-2299387" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2299386" wrote:

"Joebo720;c-2299383" wrote:
They have roughly 60 more GL's? You don't get to 339M with bad rosters. It's not even close. We had 48 sign up.

Ignore Kyno on these things. He is duty bound to defend CG's practices.

Everyone else knows TW MM is bad. Luckily for everyone, the rewards difference isn't much, so a loss doesn't matter in that regard. Just have some fun with it and go stress free.

What am I defending, are you saying the actual match up is 290M against 339M? I can assure you its not.

Nor did I say this was good or the way it should be.

The simple act of coming in and trying to explain away the GP difference is defending CG. It's always been active GP, and at 290M I'd bet the OP knows how to tell how many of the 339M GP actually joined.

Napkin math says their average roster is 1M GP higher per person. Those are different type rosters when you are talking a 5.9M average to a 6.9M. As it would be for a 4.9 v a 5.9. It's why there are divisions in GAC. Shouldn't be hard to figure out.

edit: and yes i do know how mm works. I know it factors in who joined and encourages sandbagging. But the caliber of player is different.

"StarSon;c-2299390" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2299387" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2299386" wrote:

"Joebo720;c-2299383" wrote:
They have roughly 60 more GL's? You don't get to 339M with bad rosters. It's not even close. We had 48 sign up.

Ignore Kyno on these things. He is duty bound to defend CG's practices.

Everyone else knows TW MM is bad. Luckily for everyone, the rewards difference isn't much, so a loss doesn't matter in that regard. Just have some fun with it and go stress free.

What am I defending, are you saying the actual match up is 290M against 339M? I can assure you its not.

Nor did I say this was good or the way it should be.

The simple act of coming in and trying to explain away the GP difference is defending CG. It's always been active GP, and at 290M I'd bet the OP knows how to tell how many of the 339M GP actually joined.

I didnt try to explain away anything.

"DarjeloSalas;c-2299399" wrote:
340M v 395M for us.

Our active is 295, so I know their’s will be similar. But at 6.8M average v 7.9M average I’m sure this TW will be a thriller.

Yep, sounds thrilling.