[MEGA] Conquest 7

"CG_Doja_Fett_MINI;c-2292617" wrote:

"Calbion;c-2292572" wrote:

"CG_Doja_Fett_MINI;c-2292517" wrote:

"TVF;c-2292507" wrote:
I'm not sure "several" covers it lol.

"Various" felt too vague and "cornucopia" seems too festive.

I get the attempt at humour to mitigate some of the tension but this is an infuriating flippant response to the player community.

It was a response to TVF's post. The issue itself is being taken very seriously by everyone in the studio, including me.

If you don't like how I choose to interact with the community, feel free to let EA know.

We just need to hire Keegan Michael Key as your Anger Translator, that is all.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand game update in an hour.

This must be a record on canceling an in-game event.

"Legend91;c-2292642" wrote:
that moment when you just have to like a TVF post
sith's serious

When I'm wrong, I'm wrong.

Conquest is way worse now.

Man y’all are some whiny folks ‘round these parts. Not an apologist, but they worked pretty hard to shake up Conquest to keep it interesting. And while I would love to have a game with zero issues, that’s just not how these things work. Get off your high horses and let them work through the problems.

ok, you (CG) ruined flexibility by nerfing characters (yeah, I forgot that you wanted a feedback on this one, but noone of us understood why - nothing changed, although most of us didn't want it), ruined fleet arena, ruined TW, ruined GA, delayed 1 month the conquest, thus making some of us unable to use the scavenger shop and couldn't meet the requirements for executor, now you ruined the entire conquest (ask around for a feedback! lol). and all this for a month! i doubt that any other game had so big "success" for so short period of time. please cancel this conquest to ruin the plans for the scavenger shop again and at least I'll find a reason to stop playing this travesty of a game you made - and, hell, it was doing pretty well before you decided to ruin it.
"feel free to inform EA" - is this your best answer??? you clearly see that people just don't like what you did and now after so many bugs you continue with the arrogant replies. did you test this conquest?? even some feats are bugged. what are you paid for?? sure isn't for just trying to think how to milk more and more the gamers - which now is more than normal even for your standards. how the hell you'll compensate people now? "we've made the conquest more fun" (or something like that) - who the hell told you it's more fun now??? did you get the feedbacks already?? or yeah, we know, you don't care. well, i hope many will let EA know about your "concerned" studio

"Starslayer;c-2292643" wrote:
So far (emphasis on ‘so far’), i like it. It was fun using an undergeared ezra with jml or my newly geared bh. That’s exactly what i’m looking for in this game mode, some variety to shake things up and keep it enjoyable.
But it will most likely change next week when the real feat grind will start. Tbh, i don’t mind being locked out of first crate if i can’t accomplish some feats because my roster isn’t wide enough, even if it means i won’t have maul in 3 months. They want to push players to develop their roster and make the conquest character more exclusive, ok, fair enough. But the grind is really, really not my idea of fun and it’s a major turn off. That’s what sim tickets are for (thx for AB, btw, awesome).

The bits you’re saying you like are essentially unchanged from the first conquest. Using all of your own roster in your own unique and creative ways to beat the content.

The bits you don’t like are all the new bits that everyone else is taking about.

It sounds like you actually agree whole heartedly with everyone posting negatively, albeit in a positive manner.

"VladoVD;c-2292659" wrote:
ok, you (CG) ruined flexibility by nerfing characters (yeah, I forgot that you wanted a feedback on this one, but noone of us understood why - nothing changed, although most of us didn't want it), ruined fleet arena, ruined TW, ruined GA, delayed 1 month the conquest, thus making some of us unable to use the scavenger shop and couldn't meet the requirements for executor, now you ruined the entire conquest (ask around for a feedback! lol). and all this for a month! i doubt that any other game had so big "success" for so short period of time. please cancel this conquest to ruin the plans for the scavenger shop again and at least I'll find a reason to stop playing this travesty of a game you made - and, hell, it was doing pretty well before you decided to ruin it.
"feel free to inform EA" - is this your best answer??? you clearly see that people just don't like what you did and now after so many bugs you continue with the arrogant replies. did you test this conquest?? even some feats are bugged. what are paid for?? sure isn't for just trying to think how to milk more and more the gamers - which now is more than normal even for your standards. how the hell you'll compensate people now?

He isn't the programmer and he is also a real person behind the keyboard so don't slate it all at him. I'm guessing your thr kind of person who shouts at a shop keeper when the delivery man doesn't show up.

"Obi_Cola;c-2292656" wrote:
Man y’all are some whiny folks ‘round these parts. Not an apologist, but they worked pretty hard to shake up Conquest to keep it interesting. And while I would love to have a game with zero issues, that’s just not how these things work. Get off your high horses and let them work through the problems.

Good try CG

Are we going to get the gems and conquest currency back spent during this cancelled conquest?

"KnightsTemplar;c-2292669" wrote:
Are we going to get the gems and conquest currency back spent during this cancelled conquest?

Better do, wasted time, crystals for this, only to have everything not even work properly