Dear CG,How do you plan to integrate conquest in the monthly calendar ? Is Conquest first 2 weeks and TBs last 2 weeks an option ?

They dont have a full schedule nailed down just yet, but in the past I believe they have said that individual and guild content dont really play a roll on each other, as they have to play well within thier own group.

Any chance we can talk them into twice a month? Lol

"RTS;c-2238316" wrote:"Starslayer;d-242675" wrote:Dear CG,How do you plan to integrate conquest in the monthly calendar ? Conquest starts the 1st of the month and goes for 2 weeks.Yep, but I wonder how it will fit with all the other events. We now have a lot of non-daily content: Raids, Assault Battles, GAC, TB, TW, GC, Conquest. All those are time consuming, and don't misunderstand me, lots of content is a good thing imo, and I will welcome even more. However, it calls for some scheduling to avoid to jam pack some days with events, which might cause some players to not engage content because it takes too long (or cause frustration) and have others not much to do days, which may cause boredom. As TBs are 2x6 days and Conquest 14 days, seemed an valid option (and easily achievable) to not overlap them.

"Starslayer;c-2238376" wrote:"RTS;c-2238316" wrote:"Starslayer;d-242675" wrote:Dear CG,How do you plan to integrate conquest in the monthly calendar ? Conquest starts the 1st of the month and goes for 2 weeks.Yep, but I wonder how it will fit with all the other events. We now have a lot of non-daily content: Raids, Assault Battles, GAC, TB, TW, GC, Conquest. All those are time consuming, and don't misunderstand me, lots of content is a good thing imo, and I will welcome even more. However, it calls for some scheduling to avoid to jam pack some days with events, which might cause some players to not engage content because it takes too long (or cause frustration) and have others not much to do days, which may cause boredom. As TBs are 2x6 days and Conquest 14 days, seemed an valid option (and easily achievable) to not overlap them.While I do agree with the sentiment, TBs and TWs alternate so there would still be conflicting days (such as you expressed) whichever way they decide to schedule Conquest. I wouldn’t mind seeing GAC go down to just 2 weeks on the off times of Conquest, but this seems a difficult ask for a revamp of the GAC event schedule and structure (not to mention many players enjoy GAC quite a bit more than I do and could be upset by such a change).

Conquest doesn't take a ton of time. It's fine.

Monthly Conquest | EA Forums

HandSolo93
4 years ago
I’m still baffled over people complaining about this game getting «too much» to do. Don’t play games if you don’t have time or desire to actually play.
UC-mariogsh
New Traveler
4 years ago
"Rokaryn_Mazel;c-2238459" wrote:
Once a month seems fine for Conquest. Many people enjoy it, some don't like it. I think the dividing line is if you run one account or multiple.

Ideally, I'd like to see:

Conquest week one line up with GAC dead week, like we have right now. I don't think the timeframes work out here, but it would be ideal for time consumption. GAC dead week often seems like there is too little to do in game.

Secondly, make assault battles auto complete like Galactic Challenges. I know sim is a thing, but it would still be a fair QoL update to just save us from pressing auto and setting our device down.

Wrong, twice a month and we've a deal
Pengin83
4 years ago
"HandSolo93;c-2238464" wrote:
I’m still baffled over people complaining about this game getting «too much» to do. Don’t play games if you don’t have time or desire to actually play.

Personally, I think CG is a little slow in making old events simmable. There’s really no reason we still have to manually play HSTR. And old tiers on assault battles (really even new ones since those can take up to 30 minutes a piece). Capital ship events, the cargo ship battle, etc.
tvsfrink
4 years ago
"HandSolo93;c-2238464" wrote:
I’m still baffled over people complaining about this game getting «too much» to do. Don’t play games if you don’t have time or desire to actually play.

Is it OK if I spend three hours a day playing but don't want to spend four? Six? Eight? Would you play twenty hours a day?

The more we have to do each day the more your post falls apart.
tvsfrink
4 years ago
"Gifafi;c-2238607" wrote:
"TVF;c-2238391" wrote:
Conquest doesn't take a ton of time. It's fine.

Except when make into a new game mode requiring hundreds of extra battles

Over two weeks, so yeah.

And you can do 8 battles a day with no refreshes. So 8x14=112. Hundred, not hundreds.
Emguy158
4 years ago
sLAp iN tHE faCE
djSkinless
4 years ago
Anyone know if the feats are going to alternate or if they are set? It’d be a real shame to keep the same exact ones over and over I think =\
Gifford_Alex
4 years ago
"Scuttlebutt;c-2238209" wrote:
Any chance we can talk them into twice a month? Lol

Sure - for 50% rewards : CG
UC-mariogsh
New Traveler
4 years ago
Yeah... let's hope this monthly thing doesn't last long enough

Twice a month is perfect
GifafiTho
4 years ago
"TVF;c-2238391" wrote:
Conquest doesn't take a ton of time. It's fine.

Except when make into a new game mode requiring hundreds of extra battles