Nice GaC matchmaking CG
Average of 3 GL's vs my 0. Awesome job with fixing the match-making CG. Thank you.
Forum Discussion
"Legend91;c-2454414" wrote:"Disruptor92;c-2454401" wrote:"Dapper7425_;c-2454326" wrote:"PrettyFly4QuiGuy;c-2454282" wrote:"Dapper7425_;c-2454277" wrote:
Pay to win game bro
Not true sis
Well, GAC is pay to win.
If you look the top 50 of Kyber 1, all the players have spent more than 50.000$ ar least in the game.
And of all the players of K1, I bet only the 1% have never spent a single $ in the game.
GAC is literally the least pay to win mode in the game. You can spend thousands of dollars per month, and will still end up at roughly a 50% win rate over a longer period of time. Just like most F2P players. It MIGHT only appy to like the top 10 in k1, but they're all so close to each other in roster strength that it's still about skill 95% of the time.
The matchmaking doesn't care if you are F2P or P2P. All it cares about is your rating, which is just based on your wins and losses. Being a P2P player makes no difference if you are going up against a F2P of the same rating. You two have the same rating for a reason, so according to the system, their chances of winning are as high as yours. So it's roughly a 50/50 just by the nature of the system. If it wasn't, then you two wouldn't be at the same rank in the first place.
So no, GAC is not P2W.
Thanks to DCs, GAC is THE p2w mode with TW coming in 2nd.
If someone decides to kraken out on DCs and the DC set is 'worth it' (like set11 with thr high defense%; current set12 is garbage ) he'll sky rocket the ladder if he 1) has a solid roster to work with and 2) he's not a total ****.
You need to define what is winning before you can make claims about pay to win. i.e. if two F2P accounts face off in GAC, one will win. Or say 7 F2P accounts are grouped together for a weekly event, there is no p2w involved. Or say an f2p account plays a p2W account and the f2p account wins. These are all reasonable examples of match ups in GAC where f2p wins. But I suspect your definition of winning is something else.
I guarantee you that thousands upon thousands of f2p accounts win during every GAC event. The whole p2w argument is illogical if you don't define winning.
