Average of 3 GL's vs my 0. Awesome job with fixing the match-making CG. Thank you.

When did CG say they were "fixing" matchmaking (which doesn't exist beyond SR, btw).They fixed the squish.

The things you listed are all useless metrics. You are in that bracket solely because of your skill rating. Get better or get worse if you don't like where you are.

"SleepingNinja;c-2454250" wrote:"StarSon;c-2454238" wrote:The things you listed are all useless metrics. You are in that bracket solely because of your skill rating. Get better or get worse if you don't like where you are.Yes, of course that's the idea but it takes time to get the things to get better, it's always a work in progress. Can I not just be a bit frusturated and vent such once in awhile? It's been at least a few months since I got a half decently fun match-up rather than the slog of "how many GL's are on defense and will this player log in or even attack if they do" matches. :( huh my GA matchups are, will I do more than one attack this time or not.

"SleepingNinja;c-2454250" wrote:"StarSon;c-2454238" wrote:The things you listed are all useless metrics. You are in that bracket solely because of your skill rating. Get better or get worse if you don't like where you are.Yes, of course that's the idea but it takes time to get the things to get better, it's always a work in progress. Can I not just be a bit frusturated and vent such once in awhile? It's been at least a few months since I got a half decently fun match-up rather than the slog of "how many GL's are on defense and will this player log in or even attack if they do" matches. :( Sure you can vent, but yelling at CG for something that hasn't changed in like 3 years is a little silly at this point. They are likely to never change it again.

In all the ways that CG sucks, GAC matches don't even rate.

Nice GaC matchmaking CG | EA Forums

42 Replies

0bigk4z8gw1c
2 years ago
"rickertron;c-2454357" wrote:
"I_JnK_I;c-2454351" wrote:
"PeachyPeachSWGOH;c-2454341" wrote:
"Some players paid to win" != "the game mode is pay to win". Just saying, logically.

If you can minimize any skill diff by paying then yes, it is indeed pay to win.

If you can't get to the top of the ladder without paying, that makes it pay to win as well

"SleepingNinja;d-267794" wrote:

Average of 3 GL's vs my 0. Awesome job with fixing the match-making CG. Thank you.

With 4.9 GP, how do you not have a GL at this point? I would think you are not doing all you can to be competitive. Sure matchmaking pits you against some strong rosters but you might not be putting your best foot forward either.

You remember when players said the new GAC system is great because people can go for stuff they like without getting punished for it by the gp brackets?

I sure do, but this answer gives out different vibes.

The whole system is rigged anyway, since it messures "skill"™ when both players don't even have the same base (roaster) to begin with.
Screerider
Seasoned Ace
2 years ago
"SleepingNinja;c-2454652" wrote:
"Screerider;c-2454467" wrote:
So this is really just a flex thread.

I don't believe my account is worthy of flexing, nor would I ever brag about winning a round of GAC because my opponent(s) didn't participate. :(
Aw. You're doing great! Keep going!