Replace a round of 3 vs 3 with this.
3 vs 3 is substantially worse than 5 vs 5 and although I have come to terms with 3 vs 3 I think many would like to see its role diminished. I would suggest a new form of GAC with a new map call Big 3....
Forum Discussion
"LordDirt;c-2452973" wrote:"Olddumper;d-267597" wrote:
3 vs 3 is substantially worse than 5 vs 5
Please dont speak for me or others
Does he have to explicitly qualify every opinion? OP avoided words like "we" and "everyone". He even used "many" instead of "most". Methinks you are being a bit hypersensitive here.
The 2nd reply is an equally qualified opinion. Should you not also jump on them for trying to speak for you or others?
OP's Stockholm Syndrome comment is an example of him speaking for you and others, though.
