8 years ago
RNG? I think not
I've been trying to get a Triangle Health Mod for the past 5 days, burning through all my energy plus two refreshes (said in another thread). ZERO. And since the 6am refresh this past Friday, there...
"Nikoms565;950325" wrote:
Hundreds or even thousands of recorded data points is not "some small sample". Several posters/guilds have tracked drop rates for virtually every aspect of the game. Some examples are:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/91405/so-i-tracked-2-000-drops/p1
(which has several others posting large sample sizes as well).
As an example an entire guild ran drop rates on one character, specifically. Almost a year ago:
https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/21257/rey-drop-rate-32-72/p1
The findings there were virtually identical to character shard drop rates by various posters and guilds since then. The point? That drop rates are not only consistent - but have been virtually since launch. In other words, the drop rates are not only static, but haven't been changed since the beginning of the game.
And anyone who would call thousands of data points done by several different individuals (and entire guilds of 50 people) at different points in time - none of whom have any reason to bias their findings - a "small sample size" or write it off as statistically insignificant, simply does not understand statistics and probability. In fact, many of the people and groups who originally set out to record the data were hoping to find anomalies - but virtually all found the same thing. Drop rates that were random, consistent and predictable given a large enough sample size.
Sorry if actual facts are getting in the way of a handful of conspiracy theorists who "feel" it is subjective - when actual data has shown, time and time again, that it is not.