RNG!!!

There is no RNG, I learned that today.

yeah, i usually leave ben as the last man standing for that reason. if you have 2 toons left, just auto it, go to the store, buy some groceries, do some laundry, and by then he'll be done dodging.

"Astateofmind;62008" wrote:


I know usually RNG it's a bit rigged to favor of defending team in order to compensate the bad AI but this was way too much.

Yeah, no. This has been debunked by objective tracking. As opposed to the emional anecdotal "evidence" that is usually posted.

"Nikoms565;613303" wrote:

Yeah, no. This has been debunked by objective tracking. As opposed to the emional anecdotal "evidence" that is usually posted.

Obiective tracking? Lol. How about obiective tracking redoing the same GW battle over and over again where the outcome is 100% the same?

To do an objective tracking you would have to fight the same team over 1000 times. Every other lead changes the conditions of the tracking.

"Darthdaddy81;613294" wrote:
There is no RNG, I learned that today.

You just keep telling yourself that... whatever helps you sleep at night kiddo

"Astateofmind;613316" wrote:

"Nikoms565;613303" wrote:

Yeah, no. This has been debunked by objective tracking. As opposed to the emional anecdotal "evidence" that is usually posted.

Obiective tracking? Lol. How about obiective tracking redoing the same GW battle over and over again where the outcome is 100% the same?

To do an objective tracking you would have to fight the same team over 1000 times. Every other lead changes the conditions of the tracking.

Wow. The above post not only demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of the game and the way "seed" numbers work in GW, but mathematical flaws as well.

You're right. It's all rigged. Good luck with that theory. May the force be with you.

"Nikoms565;613328" wrote:

Wow. The above post not only demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of the game and the way "seed" numbers work in GW, but mathematical flaws as well.

You're right. It's all rigged. Good luck with that theory. May the force be with you.

Wow, nice way to miss the point! I do understand how the seed works in GW. I might agree or disagree with the implementation, that's not the point,

The point was: how are you going to do an "objective analysis" of RNG when you cannot take all the data into consideration? Are the GW fights supposed to be taken into consideration when processing the data? Not? In both cases you will taint the data so the test is far from objective.

And yeah, in order to be objective the test has to be done over a large number of fights in the same conditions (same teams). Which is not possible. Would have been possible in GW but as you saw that was made impossible by the way GW works. Maybe a way for them to actually hide the data under the pretext that "it gives the player the opportunity to experiment with different setups".

Anyway, do you have any links to those "objective" analysis of RNG?

"Astateofmind;613402" wrote:
Anyway, do you have any links to those "objective" analysis of RNG?

https://forums.galaxy-of-heroes.starwars.ea.com/discussion/40875/drop-rate-comparisons-between-cantina-nodes-10-12-16-9600-cantina-energy-spent

Hmmm, do you even realize we are talking about two completely separate things? I guess not.

"Astateofmind;613402" wrote:

"Nikoms565;613328" wrote:

Wow. The above post not only demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of the game and the way "seed" numbers work in GW, but mathematical flaws as well.

You're right. It's all rigged. Good luck with that theory. May the force be with you.

Wow, nice way to miss the point! I do understand how the seed works in GW. I might agree or disagree with the implementation, that's not the point,

The point was: how are you going to do an "objective analysis" of RNG when you cannot take all the data into consideration? Are the GW fights supposed to be taken into consideration when processing the data? Not? In both cases you will taint the data so the test is far from objective.

And yeah, in order to be objective the test has to be done over a large number of fights in the same conditions (same teams). Which is not possible. Would have been possible in GW but as you saw that was made impossible by the way GW works. Maybe a way for them to actually hide the data under the pretext that "it gives the player the opportunity to experiment with different setups".

Anyway, do you have any links to those "objective" analysis of RNG?

You must be a new player. This is a topic from january of this year that has been beat to death. Suffice it to say that GW has static seeds based mostly on characters used and arena doesnt. Nikoms is correct