Since Rey likely isn't a Jedi...

"Mullato;c-1019322" wrote:


You are an ****. I dont think anyone on this forum could possibly take anything you say seriously ever again. That is all.

Btw, pls don't even bother responding back. I could care-less about your retarded delusional ramblings.

You addressed me first. I will respond last.


I don't care who takes me serious and who doesn't. Anyone who doesn't see the logic in my stance isn't worth me caring about.

"Mullato;c-1019336" wrote:
Stop feeding the troll.

Says the man who's only contribution to this thread is coming in to insult me.

You're the biggest troll in the thread so far.

"Woodroward;c-1019340" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019336" wrote:
Stop feeding the troll.

Says the man who's only contribution to this thread is coming in to insult me.

You're the biggest troll in the thread so far.

You are a bigger troll than i thought.

I was the first one many pages back that told you Kylo has never had the sith tag.

I also posted a page or 2 back with a thread from February where someone is being told kylo Ren does not have the sith.

Funny you missed that post, but you respond to me when i insult you.

"Mullato;c-1019345" wrote:

"Woodroward;c-1019340" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019336" wrote:
Stop feeding the troll.

Says the man who's only contribution to this thread is coming in to insult me.

You're the biggest troll in the thread so far.

You are a bigger troll than i thought.

I was the first one many pages back that told you Kylo has never had the sith tag.

I also posted a page or 2 back with a thread from February where someone is being told kylo Ren does not have the sith.

Funny you missed that post, but you respond to me when i insult you.

So you were the first one to start trolling me in this thread. Sorry, you must have blended into the crowd. Should I call you troll prime? Would that make you feel better?

February was when he got reworked, I stated that I knew he didn't have it at that point before anyone started trying to post other threads as proof. So your response to me was trolling.


FYI, anybody who tries to scoff at me will get attitude from me in response. Every time. Period. But I'll never give it first.

I am a perfectly reasonable man. I am easily convinced of things with any reasonable evidence (which doesn't include player opinions). I am pretty laid back. I am helpful.

But if you scoff at me, you'll get some responses you don't like.

"Woodroward;c-1019354" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019345" wrote:

"Woodroward;c-1019340" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019336" wrote:
Stop feeding the troll.

Says the man who's only contribution to this thread is coming in to insult me.

You're the biggest troll in the thread so far.

You are a bigger troll than i thought.

I was the first one many pages back that told you Kylo has never had the sith tag.

I also posted a page or 2 back with a thread from February where someone is being told kylo Ren does not have the sith.

Funny you missed that post, but you respond to me when i insult you.

So you were the first one to start trolling me in this thread. Sorry, you must have blended into the crowd. Should I call you troll prime? Would that make you feel better?

February was when he got reworked, I stated that I knew he didn't have it at that point before anyone started trying to post other threads as proof. So your response to me was trolling.


FYI, anybody who tries to scoff at me will get attitude from me in response. Every time. Period. But I'll never give it first.

I am a perfectly reasonable man. I am easily convinced of things with any reasonable evidence (which doesn't include player opinions). I am pretty laid back. I am helpful.

But if you scoff at me, you'll get some responses you don't like.

Then provide proof of kylo ren ever having the sith tag. Actual proof.

If you can't do that then shutup about it and move on. Matter of fact if you can't provide proof then there no reason for you to even be arguing.

If you respond back with more delusional rambling without proof, then that just proves you are a troll.

So provide proof or just accept it. You have 3 ways you can respond to this.
1. Provide actual proof.
2. Respond back with more blah blah delusional rambling
3. Don't respond and move on.

The choice is yours, but my money is on option #2.

"Mullato;c-1019372" wrote:
Then provide proof of kylo ren ever having the sith tag. Actual proof.

If you can't do that then shutup about it and move on. Matter of fact if you can't provide proof then there no reason for you to even be arguing.

If you respond back with more delusional rambling without proof, then that just proves you are a troll.

So provide proof or just accept it. You have 3 ways you can respond to this.
1. Provide actual proof.
2. Respond back with more blah blah delusional rambling
3. Don't respond and move on.

The choice is yours, but my money is on option #2.

See that's where your logic is flawed. I don't care if people believe me, and I'll go out of my way not to give scoffers what they ask for.

I have tried to convince no one of anything, therefore I have no need to produce proof. However others ARE trying to convince me of something, and that means that proof is required.

So you can continue to troll me by posting in response without proof, or you can move on. The choice is yours. Are you a man of merit or a troll? Your choice reveals the answer to this question.

The burden of proof is on you. not me. YOU are the one insisting I adopt your understanding.

"Woodroward;c-1019378" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019372" wrote:
Then provide proof of kylo ren ever having the sith tag. Actual proof.

If you can't do that then shutup about it and move on. Matter of fact if you can't provide proof then there no reason for you to even be arguing.

If you respond back with more delusional rambling without proof, then that just proves you are a troll.

So provide proof or just accept it. You have 3 ways you can respond to this.
1. Provide actual proof.
2. Respond back with more blah blah delusional rambling
3. Don't respond and move on.

The choice is yours, but my money is on option #2.

See that's where your logic is flawed. I don't care if people believe me, and I'll go out of my way not to give scoffers what they ask for.

I have tried to convince no one of anything, therefore I have no need to produce proof. However others ARE trying to convince me of something, and that means that proof is required.

So you can continue to troll me by posting in response without proof, or you can move on. The choice is yours. Are you a man of merit or a troll? Your choice reveals the answer to this question.

The burden of proof is on you. not me. YOU are the one insisting I adopt your understanding.

Lmao, that's not not how it works buddy.

You are trying to convince everyone that Something happened. Everyone else is saying that Nothing happened. You dont have to provide proof when Nothing happens.

This is like everyone telling you that trees can't jump, but you are telling us that one time you think you saw a tree jump. Who do you think needs to provide proof in that case? Exactly, if nothing happens there is no proof necessary, if something happens, then proof is necessary.

As it stands, this isn't looking good for the case or not of you being a troll or delusional. Because there is plenty of proof in this thread of that.

"Tatebomb;c-1019381" wrote:
You were shown a screenshot of when he first came out with no sith tag. And multiple posts from players during the time frame you said you saw it saying that it wasn't there. What else do you need? A dev isn't likely to respond and no one took 130 screenshots of kylo. You're just trolling everyone at this point.

Not at all. You all are addressing me. I am merely replying.

The screenshot was from over a year ago, far outside the time frame I stated him to have had the tag, so is proof of nothing. I told you exactly what I need to be proven wrong. I said from the get go that doesn't include logical fallacies and opinions. I've stated over and over that screenshots would be proof, yet no one produces them.

No, I am not trolling. I am being trolled. Any post telling me I am wrong with no proof is a trolling post.

"Mullato;c-1019372" wrote:

"Woodroward;c-1019354" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019345" wrote:

"Woodroward;c-1019340" wrote:

"Mullato;c-1019336" wrote:
Stop feeding the troll.

Says the man who's only contribution to this thread is coming in to insult me.

You're the biggest troll in the thread so far.

You are a bigger troll than i thought.

I was the first one many pages back that told you Kylo has never had the sith tag.

I also posted a page or 2 back with a thread from February where someone is being told kylo Ren does not have the sith.

Funny you missed that post, but you respond to me when i insult you.

So you were the first one to start trolling me in this thread. Sorry, you must have blended into the crowd. Should I call you troll prime? Would that make you feel better?

February was when he got reworked, I stated that I knew he didn't have it at that point before anyone started trying to post other threads as proof. So your response to me was trolling.


FYI, anybody who tries to scoff at me will get attitude from me in response. Every time. Period. But I'll never give it first.

I am a perfectly reasonable man. I am easily convinced of things with any reasonable evidence (which doesn't include player opinions). I am pretty laid back. I am helpful.

But if you scoff at me, you'll get some responses you don't like.

Then provide proof of kylo ren ever having the sith tag. Actual proof.

If you can't do that then shutup about it and move on. Matter of fact if you can't provide proof then there no reason for you to even be arguing.

If you respond back with more delusional rambling without proof, then that just proves you are a troll.

So provide proof or just accept it. You have 3 ways you can respond to this.
1. Provide actual proof.
2. Respond back with more blah blah delusional rambling
3. Don't respond and move on.

The choice is yours, but my money is on option #2.

And everybody knows what a #2 is, with plenty of proof. :D

"Mullato;c-1019384" wrote:

Lmao, that's not not how it works buddy.

You are trying to convince everyone that Something happened. Everyone else is saying that Nothing happened. You dont have to provide proof when Nothing happens.

This is like everyone telling you that trees can't jump, but you are telling us that one time you think you saw a tree jump. Who do you think needs to provide proof in that case? Exactly, if nothing happens there is no proof necessary, if something happens, then proof is necessary.

As it stands, this isn't looking good for the case or not of you being a troll or delusional. Because there is plenty of proof in this thread of that.

IF I was trying to convince anyone of anything. That would be the case. But I have stated over and over again that that isn't the case. I am trying to convince NO ONE of ANYTHING.

You ARE trying to convince me of something. That means the burden of proof falls to you, and that is EXACTLY how it works.

Maybe you should look into the burden of proof a little bit.