Stop the TW mismatches

"Waqui;c-2120262" wrote:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2120220" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2120194" wrote:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2120186" wrote:

"Waqui;c-2119957" wrote:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2119948" wrote:

"DarjeloSalas;c-2119604" wrote:
Any data to explain your point @Natetiffer

End of this TW I probably will if I remember to take screenshots.

Why not take your screenshots now or show your proof now?

It's setup phase?

In which case you've already been matched. No need to wait to document that your opponents "have nothing" compared to your g13s.

Ummmm...?

Your own claim/words:

"Ggdjqjchsabjdj;c-2119221" wrote:
Haha yeah. I’m in a bad guild with my friends. I got g13s and stuff and our opponents have nothing so it’s easy wins.

No I mean what’s your point? My point is that the matchmaking doesn’t take into account characters and stuff. What’s yours?

This has been my biggest complaint for a year because it should be an easy fix since it was already done for GAC

The horrible matchmaking is by far my biggest complaint with the game.

@Kyno Do you know if CG is workin at improvment of TW's matchmaking and to prevent 300KK GP guilds from INTENTIONAL droping members for the event to get better matchmaking for them?

As it not fun to play vs guild that has almost 1kk GP more at every guild member then my guild.

thank you in advance for the answer

Here is my guild's current match .
I'm not even going to say it

"MrPosz;c-2120855" wrote:
@Kyno Do you know if CG is workin at improvment of TW's matchmaking and to prevent 300KK GP guilds from INTENTIONAL droping members for the event to get better matchmaking for them?

As it not fun to play vs guild that has almost 1kk GP more at every guild member then my guild.

thank you in advance for the answer

They are not. Their last official response on the subject was they didn’t believe sandbagging was possible.

So, my guild has been having a low TW participation rate at 38/50 joining consistently. We won 8/10 of our last TW, but today this horribly overpowered guild compared to ours (they have us on 15 key characters both in gear and #s as shown in my post above) so my question is this:

Did a having a high win % from the low % join going into a higher joining GP matchup lead to us facing what I am calling an OP guild?

The factors are all true, I just don't know if am algorithm computes it with them.

"StarSon;c-2120874" wrote:

"MrPosz;c-2120855" wrote:
Kyno Do you know if CG is workin at improvment of TW's matchmaking and to prevent 300KK GP guilds from INTENTIONAL droping members for the event to get better matchmaking for them?

As it not fun to play vs guild that has almost 1kk GP more at every guild member then my guild.

thank you in advance for the answer

They are not. Their last official response on the subject was they didn’t believe sandbagging was possible.

Well that was the response in the QA, in further discussion, they have said they would look into the whole system again, but nothing official or promised.

The background behind that answer stems from no statistical outliers in performance, when they have looked at the data in more detail.

"Kyno;c-2121480" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2120874" wrote:

"MrPosz;c-2120855" wrote:
Kyno Do you know if CG is workin at improvment of TW's matchmaking and to prevent 300KK GP guilds from INTENTIONAL droping members for the event to get better matchmaking for them?

As it not fun to play vs guild that has almost 1kk GP more at every guild member then my guild.

thank you in advance for the answer

They are not. Their last official response on the subject was they didn’t believe sandbagging was possible.

blah blah blah

...that answer stems from no statistical outliers in performance, when they have looked at the data in more detail.

I have a difficult time agreeing or accepting that there are no differences in performance. As I said above, a 6m gp players' roster is easily capable of dealing with two 3m gp rosters, etc. Seems they need to dig a bit deeper.

"Starl0rd;c-2121502" wrote:

"Kyno;c-2121480" wrote:

"StarSon;c-2120874" wrote:

"MrPosz;c-2120855" wrote:
Kyno Do you know if CG is workin at improvment of TW's matchmaking and to prevent 300KK GP guilds from INTENTIONAL droping members for the event to get better matchmaking for them?

As it not fun to play vs guild that has almost 1kk GP more at every guild member then my guild.

thank you in advance for the answer

They are not. Their last official response on the subject was they didn’t believe sandbagging was possible.

blah blah blah

...that answer stems from no statistical outliers in performance, when they have looked at the data in more detail.

I have a difficult time agreeing or accepting that there are no differences in performance. As I said above, a 6m gp players' roster is easily capable of dealing with two 3m gp rosters, etc. Seems they need to dig a bit deeper.

That's because that's not what I said.

When they look at statistics for the game mode they dont see any particular group or entity that is falling outside of the expected range on the win loss ratio.