Structuring the next raid
There have been a lot of posts about the current raid, mostly harshly critical. I've tried to be helpful and upbeat, encouraging other players. And I don't regret that. Most of the posts have focusse...
Forum Discussion
Obviously I'm well aware of the lifespan problems with raid Omicrons. My question is, why are you against them being added? Omicrons being added doesn't mean you have to apply them. Save your mats if that's your choice.
What my proposal says is that if every team (except one or perhaps two that CG wants to force you to max upgrade) has an Omicron, that allows easy, stress-free access to max score (for that one squad) then this provides a way for players to prioritize QoL. Other players can choose to save those mats for other areas of the game, and that's fine, but what is wrong with giving players the option? Rather than making a case against CG adding raid Omis, you've made a case that players shouldn't spend mats on raid Omis. Do you have an argument against CG adding more raid Omis and thus giving players the option?
I'm not against them being added, I'm just not in favor of them being added due to lifespan and how niche they would be. Which I specified in my response as unless the raids remove character restrictions. I also said in my response applying omicrons are up to the player. I would very likely save my omicron materials, and I believe that many (not all) players would feel the same way. And yes, that's their choice. In order for me to consider them I would need to have CG remove the limitations on them (lifespan, character only used in one raid not all).
